首页|企业"脱实向虚"、ESG评级与审计费用

企业"脱实向虚"、ESG评级与审计费用

扫码查看
本文基于2012-2022年中国上市公司数据,构建固定效应和调节效应模型,对企业"脱实向虚"、ESG评级和审计费用的关联效应和影响机制进行分析。研究发现,企业"脱实向虚"对审计费用存在正向影响,ESG评级会抑制企业"脱实向虚"对审计费用的正向作用,尤其是ESG三要素中的S(社会)、G(公司治理)调节效应更为突出。此外,在国有企业和第二、第三产业中,企业"脱实向虚"对审计费用的正向影响更为显著,同时在制造业,信息传输、软件和信息技术服务业和采矿业中,企业"脱实向虚"同样会显著提升审计费用。这些发现为理解企业"脱实向虚"与审计费用之间的影响关系提供新的视角。
Corporate Financialization,ESG Ratings and Audit Fees
Based on data from listed companies of China from 2012 to 2022,this paper constructs fixed-effects and moderation-effects models to analyze the correlation and impact mechanism between corporate financialization,ESG ratings,and audit fees.The study finds that corporate financialization has a positive impact on audit fees,while ESG ratings mitigate this positive effect,particularly with the moderation effects of the S(social)and G(corporate governance)components of ESG being more pronounced.Furthermore,the impact of corporate financialization on audit fees is more significant in state-owned enterprises and within the secondary and tertiary industries.Additionally,in manufacturing,information transmission,software,and information technology services,as well as mining,corporate financialization also significantly increases audit fees.These findings provide new insights into understanding the relationship between corporate financialization and audit fees.

Corporate FinancializationESG RatingAudit Fee

柴毅、舒锐

展开 >

云南大学经济学院

中国现代经济史研究中心

企业"脱实向虚" ESG评级 审计费用

2024

新经济
广东省社会科学院港澳研究中心

新经济

影响因子:0.036
ISSN:1009-8461
年,卷(期):2024.(12)