首页|糖蜜和植物乳杆菌对啤酒花枝叶青贮品质、微生物数量及瘤胃降解率的影响

糖蜜和植物乳杆菌对啤酒花枝叶青贮品质、微生物数量及瘤胃降解率的影响

扫码查看
[目的]研究糖蜜和植物乳杆菌对啤酒花枝叶青贮品质、微生物数量及瘤胃降解率的影响。[方法]以啤酒花枝叶为原料,研究添加糖蜜与植物乳杆菌对啤酒花枝叶青贮发酵特征及绵羊瘤胃降解率的影响,设置处理无添加剂处理(CK)、5%糖蜜(Molasses,M0 处理)、5%糖蜜+105 CFU/g FM植物乳杆菌的组合(Molasses and Lactobacillus plantarum,M1)3 个处理。均在室温(19~23℃)下贮藏 90d后评价感官质量,测定分析青贮品质、微生物数量和瘤胃降解率。[结果](1)M0、M1 处理的感官质量评价优于对照处理,M1 处理的DM显著高于CK和M0 处理(P<0。05),M1 处理的CP显著高于CK处理(P<0。05),M0、M1 处理的WSC显著高于CK处理(P<0。05)。M1 处理的NDF显著低于CK和M0 处理(P<0。05),M0、M1 处理的ADF显著低于CK处理(P<0。05),M1 处理的LA显著高于CK、M0 处理(P<0。05),M1 处理的AA显著高于CK处理(P<0。05),M0、M1 处理的pH、NH3-N/TN均显著低于CK处理(P<0。05);(2)M1 处理的乳酸菌显著高于CK、M0 处理(P<0。05),M0、M1 处理的酵母菌显著低于CK处理(P<0。05);(3)瘤胃降解12h时,各处理之间DMD差异不显著,M0、M1 处理的OMD、ADFD、NDFD显著高于CK处理(P<0。05);瘤胃降解 24h时,M1 处理的DMD显著高于CK处理,M0、M1 处理的OMD、ADFD、NDFD显著高于CK处理(P<0。05);瘤胃降解 48h时,M1 处理的DMD、ADFD显著高于 CK、M0 处理(P<0。05),M0、M1 处理的 OMD、DNFD 显著高于 CK 处理(P<0。05)。[结论]糖蜜和植物乳杆菌在啤酒花枝叶青贮发酵中起到了良好的协同作用,有效地改善了青贮品质,抑制了啤酒花枝叶青贮过程中有害微生物的生长,促进了瘤胃微生物的活动。
Effects of molasses and Lactobacillus plantarum on silage quality,microbial quantity and rumen degradation rate of hop branches and leaves
[Objective]Effects of molasses and Lactobacillus plantarum on silage quality,microbial quan-tity and rumen degradation rate of hop branches and leaves.[Methods]In this experiment,hop branches and leaves were used as raw materials to study the effects of adding molasses and Lactobacillus plantarum on fer-mentation characteristics of hop branches and leaves silage and rumen degradation rate of sheep.The treatments were no additive treatment(CK treatment),5%molasses(Molasses,M0 treatment),5%molasses +105 CFU/g FM Lactobacillus plantarum combination(Molasses and Lactobacillus plantarum,M1 treatment).After 90 days of storage at room temperature(19-23℃),the sensory quality was evaluated,the silage quality and microbial quantity were analyzed,and after that,the rumen degradation rate was determined.[Results](1)The sensory quality evaluation of M0 and M1 treatments was better than that of the control treatment.The DM of M1 treat-ment was significantly higher than that of CK and M0 treatments(P<0.05).The CP of M1 treatment was sig-nificantly higher than that of CK treatment(P<0.05).The NDF of M1 treatment was significantly lower than that of CK and M0 treatments(P<0.05).The ADF of M0 and M1 treatments was significantly lower than that of CK treatment(P<0.05).The LA of M1 treatment was significantly higher than that of CK and M0 treatments(P<0.05).The AA of M1 treatment was significantly higher than that of CK treatment(P<0.05).The pH and NH3-N/TN of M0 and M1 treatments were significantly lower than those of CK treatment(P<0.05).(2)The lactic acid bacteria of M1 treatment was significantly higher than that of CK and M0 treatment(P<0.05),and the yeast of M0 and M1 treatment was significantly lower than that of CK treatment(P<0.05).(3)At 12 h of rumen degradation,there was no significant difference in DMD among the treatments.The OMD,AD-FD and NDFD of M0 and M1 treatments were significantly higher than those of CK treatment(P<0.05).At 24 h of rumen degradation,DMD of M1 treatment was significantly higher than that of CK treatment,OMD,ADFD and NDFD of M0 and M1 treatments were significantly higher than those of CK treatment(P<0.05).At 48 h of rumen degradation,DMD and ADFD of M1 treatment were significantly higher than those of CK and M0 treat-ments(P<0.05),OMD and DNFD of M0 and M1 treatments were significantly higher than those of CK treat-ment(P<0.05).[Conclusion]Molasses and Lactobacillus plantarum plays a good synergistic effect in the fermentation of hop branches and leaves silage,can effectively improve the quality of silage,inhibit the growth of harmful microorganisms during hop branches and leaves silage,and promote the activity of rumen microor-ganisms.

hop branches and leavesLactobacillus plantarumsilagefermentation qualityrumen deg-radation rate

鲜欧洋、李肖、陈永成、王挺、王旭哲、张凡凡、马春晖

展开 >

石河子大学动物科技学院,新疆石河子 832000

新疆伊犁哈萨克自治州畜牧总站,新疆伊宁 835000

伟林贸易有限公司,湖南衡阳 421000

啤酒花枝叶 植物乳杆菌 青贮 发酵品质 瘤胃降解率

现代农业产业技术体系建设项目新疆维吾尔自治区优质饲草产业技术体系建设项目新疆维吾尔自治区创新环境(人才、基地)建设专项昌吉州适度规模化肉牛育肥的技术集成与示范推广项目

2022XJSC-Z-022021D140082021Z02

2024

新疆农业科学
新疆农业科学院 新疆农业大学 新疆农学会

新疆农业科学

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.698
ISSN:1001-4330
年,卷(期):2024.61(3)
  • 36