畜牧与生物技术杂志(英文版)2024,Vol.15Issue(1) :456-462.DOI:10.1186/s40104-023-00902-8

Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein(RNP)electroporation

Gyeong-Min Gim Kyeong-Hyeon Eom Dong-Hyeok Kwon Dae-Jin Jung Dae-Hyun Kim Jun-Koo Yi Jae-Jung Ha Ji-Hyun Lee Seong-Beom Lee Woo-Jae Son Soo-Young Yum Won-Wu Lee Goo Jang
畜牧与生物技术杂志(英文版)2024,Vol.15Issue(1) :456-462.DOI:10.1186/s40104-023-00902-8

Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein(RNP)electroporation

Gyeong-Min Gim 1Kyeong-Hyeon Eom 1Dong-Hyeok Kwon 2Dae-Jin Jung 3Dae-Hyun Kim 3Jun-Koo Yi 3Jae-Jung Ha 3Ji-Hyun Lee 4Seong-Beom Lee 4Woo-Jae Son 4Soo-Young Yum 4Won-Wu Lee 4Goo Jang5
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. Laboratory of Theriogenology and Biotechnology,Department of Veterinary Clinical Science,College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute of Veterinary Science,Seoul National University,Seoul,Republic of Korea;LARTBio Co.,Ltd.,Seoul,Republic of Korea
  • 2. Laboratory of Theriogenology and Biotechnology,Department of Veterinary Clinical Science,College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute of Veterinary Science,Seoul National University,Seoul,Republic of Korea
  • 3. Gyeongsangbukdo Livestock Research Institute,Yeongju,Republic of Korea
  • 4. LARTBio Co.,Ltd.,Seoul,Republic of Korea
  • 5. Laboratory of Theriogenology and Biotechnology,Department of Veterinary Clinical Science,College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute of Veterinary Science,Seoul National University,Seoul,Republic of Korea;LARTBio Co.,Ltd.,Seoul,Republic of Korea;Comparative Medicine Disease Research Center,Seoul National University,Seoul,Republic of Korea
  • 折叠

Abstract

Background Genome editing has been considered as powerful tool in agricultural fields.However,genome editing progress in cattle has not been fast as in other mammal species,for some disadvantages including long gestational periods,single pregnancy,and high raising cost.Furthermore,technically demanding methods such as microinjection and somatic cell nuclear transfer(SCNT)are needed for gene editing in cattle.In this point of view,electroporation in embryos has been risen as an alternative.Results First,editing efficiency of our electroporation methods were tested for embryos.Presence of mutation on embryo was confirmed byT7E1 assay.With first combination,mutation rates for MSTN and PRNP were 57.6%±13.7%and 54.6%±13.5%,respectively.In case of MSTN/BLG,mutation rates were 83.9%±23.6%for MSTN,84.5%±18.0%for BLG.Afterwards,the double-KO embryos were transferred to surrogates and mutation rate was identified in resultant calves by targeted deep sequencing.Thirteen recipients were transferred for MSTN/PRNP,4 calves were delivered,and one calf underwent an induction for double KO.Ten surrogates were given double-KO embryos for MSTN/BLG,and four of the six calves that were born had mutations in both genes.Conclusions These data demonstrated that production of genome edited cattle via electroporation of RNP could be effectively applied.Finally,MSTN and PRNP from beef cattle and MSTN and BLG from dairy cattle have been born and they will be valuable resources for future precision breeding.

Key words

Beta-lactoglobulin/Cattle/CRISPR-Cas9/Electroporation/Knockout/MSTN/PRNP

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF-2021 R1F1A105195313)

SRC program:382 Comparative medicine Disease Research Center(NRF-2021R1A5A1033157)

Research Institute of Veterinary Science()

BK21 Four for Future Veterinary Medicine Leading Education and Research Center()

a Seoul National University(SNU)grant(550e2020005)

出版年

2024
畜牧与生物技术杂志(英文版)
中国科学技术协会

畜牧与生物技术杂志(英文版)

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.765
ISSN:1674-9782
参考文献量23
段落导航相关论文