Coordinated Development and Regional Differences of China's Tea Culture and Tourism Industry
Based on the panel data of 18 tea producing provinces in China from 2010 to 2020,this paper constructs an evaluation index system for the comprehensive development of the industries,and analyzes the comprehensive development level,coordinated development characteristics and regional differences of China's tea culture and tourism industry by using entropy weighting method,coupling coordination degree model,and Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition method.The results show that the comprehensive de-velopment level index of the three industries showed a fluctuating upward trend.The average comparison of the comprehensive development level index of the industries was cultural industry>tourism industry>tea industry.During the sampling period,the development gap between industries gradually narrowed,and the tea industry had always been in a lagging type.The overall level of coordination in the tea culture and tourism industry was showing an improvement,and the coordination level was mainly in a barely coor-dinated state,with significant room for improvement.The average arrangement of regional coordination was as follows:Jiangnan Tea Area>Southwest Tea Area>South China Tea Area>Jiangbei Tea Area.The overall difference in the coordination degree of the tea culture and tourism industry was gradually nar-rowing,and the contribution rate of regional differences had always maintained a leading advantage.The difference within the South China tea region was the largest,while the difference within the Jiangnan tea region was the smallest.The difference between the South China and Jiangbei tea regions was the largest,and the difference between the Jiangnan and Southwest tea regions was the smallest.According to the re-sults of industrial reality and analysis,the article puts forward internal suggestions to promote the deep in-tegrated development of tea culture and tourism industry by excavating cultural implications,innovating development projects,integrating high-quality resources,building core areas,strengthening policy guid-ance,enhancing scientific and technological support.