首页|基于REOF的不同量级降雨侵蚀力时空变化——以重庆市为例

基于REOF的不同量级降雨侵蚀力时空变化——以重庆市为例

扫码查看
研究重庆市不同地理分区内各量级降雨侵蚀力的时空变化特征,为该地区进行更加精准的区域性水土流失防治工作提供理论依据.选取1981-2020年重庆市31个站点逐日降雨数据,利用旋转经验正交函数(Rotated Empirical Orthogonal Function,REOF)对降雨侵蚀力进行地理分区,并结合R/S、5年滑动平均、Mann-Kendall检验等方法,分析各分区不同量级降雨侵蚀力时空变化.结果表明:①重庆市降雨侵蚀力可分为6个地理区域(Ⅰ-Ⅵ区);②重庆市多年平均降雨侵蚀力为5 784.04 MJ·mm/(hm2·h·a),不同降雨侵蚀力从大到小依次为:大雨、暴雨、中雨、大暴雨;③大雨侵蚀力在Ⅰ-Ⅲ区和Ⅴ-Ⅵ区占主导优势,暴雨侵蚀力在Ⅳ区占主导优势.各分区中,中雨、大雨及暴雨侵蚀力主要集中在5-9月,大暴雨侵蚀力集中在6-8月;④ 各区不同量级降雨侵蚀力年际变化从小到大依次为:中雨、大雨、暴雨、大暴雨;同一量级降雨侵蚀力的整体变化趋势均不显著;Hurst指数表明,中雨侵蚀力在Ⅰ和V区、大雨侵蚀力在Ⅱ和V区、大暴雨侵蚀力在Ⅰ和Ⅲ区呈强持续上升趋势;⑤ 中雨、大雨及大暴雨侵蚀力在渝东南、渝东北占主导优势,暴雨侵蚀力在渝西以及重庆中部占主导优势,且Ⅰ区酉阳和秀山、Ⅱ区开州、Ⅲ区北碚和铜梁、Ⅳ区璧山和永川、Ⅴ区巫溪和云阳及Ⅵ区忠县是不同量级降雨侵蚀力的高峰中心.通过对重庆各分区不同量级降雨侵蚀力的分析,明确了可能引起土壤侵蚀的主要雨型、高发时期和潜在风险较高的地区,可为区域水土流失动态监测和水土保持措施的合理制定提供参考.
Spatio-Temporal Variation of Rainfall Erosivity of Different Magnitudes Based on the REOF Method——Take Chongqing as an Example
This study explored the spatio-temporal variation of rainfall erosivity in different zones of Chongqing,in order to provide a theoretical basis for more precise soil erosion control.The daily rainfall data of 31 meteorological stations in Chongqing from 1981 to 2020 were selected to analyze the spatio-tem-poral variation of rainfall erosivity of different magnitudes in each zone,with the method of R/S analysis,moving average,and MK trend test.The results indicate:① Rainfall erosivity can be divided into six geo-graphical zones(Ⅰ-Ⅵ)based on the method of Rotated Empirical Orthogonal Function(REOF).② The average annual rainfall erosivity is 5 784.04 MJ·mm·hm-2·h-1·a-1,with the order of reducing as heavy rain,rainstorm,moderate rain,downpour.③ Heavy rain erosivity played dominant role in zoneⅠ-Ⅲ and Ⅴ-Ⅵ,while rainstorm erosivity was dominate in zone Ⅳ.Moderate rain,heavy rain,and rain-storm erosivity of each zone were mainly distributed from May to September,while downpour erosivity mainly concentrated from J une to August.④ The yearly variation of rainfall erosivity of different magni-tudes in each zone was rising as moderate rain,heavy rain,rainstorm,downpour.The overall change trend of rainfall erosivity of same magnitude was not significant.The Hurst index showed a strong upward trend for moderate rain erosivity in zones Ⅰ and V,heavy rain in zone Ⅱ and V,and downpour in zoneⅠ and Ⅲ.⑤ The erosivity of moderate rain,heavy rain and downpour mainly concentrated in southeast and northeast,while the erosivity of rainstorm was dominant in west and central Chongqing.The rainfall erosivity of different magnitudes showed a decreasing trend from east to west.Youyang and Xiushan of zone Ⅰ,Kaizhou of Zone Ⅱ,Beibei and Tongliang of zone Ⅲ,Bishan and Yongchuan of zone Ⅳ,Wuxi and Yun-yang of Zone V,and Zhongxian of zone Ⅵ were the peak centers of the rainfall erosivity of different magnitudes.This study clarifies the main rainfall types,periods and areas with high possibility of soil erosion,dynamic monito-ring and protective measures are supposed to control regional soil erosion according to local conditions.

rainfall erosivityspatio-temporal variationrotating empirical orthogonal functionMK non-parametric testR/S analysis

靳军英、王林、金铁生、张卫华

展开 >

西南大学资源环境学院,重庆 400715

降雨侵蚀力 时空变化 旋转经验正交分解法 MK非参数趋势检验 R/S分析法

2025

西南大学学报(自然科学版)
西南大学学报编辑部

西南大学学报(自然科学版)

北大核心
影响因子:0.825
ISSN:1673-9868
年,卷(期):2025.47(1)