首页|合宪性审查实证法标准的三维结构:价值、形式与功能

合宪性审查实证法标准的三维结构:价值、形式与功能

扫码查看
宪法基本权利条款的权利价值、规范形式与协作功能构成合宪性审查实证法标准的一体三维结构.作为合宪性审查的实体标准,基本权利有主观权利与客观法、列举权利与未列举权利、积极权利与消极权利的区分.基本权利的类型覆盖合宪性审查标准及其适用的主要情形,未尽之处可以"实体自然法"标准加以概括.宪法文本与程序自然法是合宪性审查的形式标准.宪法基本权利条款是实证法规范,而实体自然法与程序自然法的适用是基本权利实证化的过程.在现代高度复杂社会,既必须以合宪性推定方法维护宪制秩序,又应该以发挥宪法作为协作法的维系"规范性预期"与"社会分化"功能为目的,审慎适用基本权利标准以判断审查对象是否合宪.
The Three-Dimensional Structure of Positive Law Standard for Constitutional Review:Value,Form and Function
The right value,normative form and collaborative function of the constitutional fundamental rights clauses constitute an integrated three-dimensional structure of positive law standard for constitutional review.As the substantive standard of constitutional review,basic rights can be divided into subjective rights and objective laws,enumerated rights and un-enumerated rights,and positive rights and negative rights.The types of basic rights cover the constitutional review standards and the main situations of their application,and what is not covered can be summarized by the"substantive natural law"standard.Constitutional text and procedural natural law are the formal standards of constitutional review.The constitutional provisions on fun-damental rights are the norms of positive law,while the application of substantive natural law and procedural natural law is the process of positivisation of fundamental rights.In a highly complex modern society,we must not only maintain the constitutional order by constitutional presumption,but also use the Constitution as a cooperative law to maintain"normative expectations"and"social differentiation".We should prudently ap-ply the basic rights standard to judge whether the review object is constitutional.

fundamental rightsconstitutional reviewpositive law standardsthree-dimensional structure

汪栋

展开 >

山东农业大学 泰山法治研究院,山东 泰安 271018

基本权利 合宪性审查 实证法标准 三维结构

教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目

20YJA820018

2024

学术界
安徽省社会科学界联合会

学术界

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.411
ISSN:1002-1698
年,卷(期):2024.(5)
  • 53