学术探索2024,Issue(7) :119-128.

论破产欺诈行为刑民界分的认定标准

On the Recognition Criteria of Criminal-Civil Boundary of Bankruptcy Fraud

杨晶 王昭武
学术探索2024,Issue(7) :119-128.

论破产欺诈行为刑民界分的认定标准

On the Recognition Criteria of Criminal-Civil Boundary of Bankruptcy Fraud

杨晶 1王昭武1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 云南大学 法学院,云南 昆明 650091
  • 折叠

摘要

破产欺诈行为既可能构成民事违法也可能构成刑事犯罪,破产欺诈行为的刑民界分是指以何种标准将破产欺诈行为中构成虚假破产罪、妨害清算罪的行为挑选出来以两罪论处.司法实务中因对虚假破产罪与妨害清算罪做了不合理的限制解释导致对破产欺诈行为做出了不合理的刑民界分,破产主体、破产欺诈行为所处何种程序不应当成为刑民界分时的筛选标准;破产欺诈行为的刑民界分除了数额、情节等可作为筛选标准外,可从破产欺诈的行为类型上进行筛选,也可从破产欺诈行为与破产状态的因果关系上进行筛选.

Abstract

Bankruptcy fraud can constitute both civil violation and criminal offense.The demarcation between civil and criminal boundaries of bankruptcy fraud refers to identifying the standard to select those fraudulent acts that constitute crimes of false bankruptcy and crimes of obstruction to liquidation for punishment.In judicial practice,an unreasonable restriction and interpre-tation of crimes of false bankruptcy and crimes of obstruction to liquidation has led to an unreasonable distinction between the civ-il and criminal boundaries of bankruptcy fraud.The subjects of bankruptcy and the procedures in which the bankruptcy fraud oc-curs should not be the criteria for distinguishing between civil and criminal boundaries.Apart from the amount and circum-stances,the behavioral types of bankruptcy fraud and the causal relationship between bankruptcy fraud and bankruptcy status can also be used as criteria for distinguishing the civil and criminal boundaries of bankruptcy fraud.

关键词

破产欺诈/虚假破产罪/妨害清算罪/刑民界分

Key words

bankruptcy fraud/false bankruptcy crime/crimes of obstruction to liquidation/criminal and civil demarcation

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

最高人民法院2021年度司法案例研究课题项目()

出版年

2024
学术探索
云南省社会科学界联合会

学术探索

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.464
ISSN:1006-723X
被引量1
参考文献量13
段落导航相关论文