首页|想象、可能性与知识

想象、可能性与知识

扫码查看
当代想象研究的一个重要变化,是从模态知识论的角度来探讨想象问题。对于其中涉及的三个问题的回应是:其一,尽管在大部分情况下想象需要借助图像来进行,但可以有非图像的想象。其二,对于CP论题:"可设想性蕴含可能性",需要对查尔莫斯的"理想的正面可设想性"增加一项"需有充分理由"的条件。并且,由于CP论题的作用与"假设"差不多,因此似可被归入假设之类,其主要意义不过是丰富了假设的一种类别,引起人们对想象在假设中的作用的关注而已。其三,威廉姆森的"形而上学模态的知识论是反事实条件知识论的一个特例"的论断是可以接受的,但他将反事实条件句知识看作是与先验和经验知识并列的第三类知识的看法,却未必能够成立。
Imagination,Possibility and Knowledge
An important change in contemporary imagination research is to approach the problem of imagination from the perspective of modal epistemology.The response to the three questions involved is that,first,although in most cases imagination requires the aid of images,there can be non-image imaginations.Second,to the CP thesis,"conceivability implies possibility",it is necessary to add a condition of"needing to be a sufficient reason"to Chalmers's"ideal positive conceivability".Moreover,since the role of CP thesis is similar to that of"hypothesis",it seems that it can be classified as hypothesis,and its main significance is only to enrich the category of hypothesis and draw attention to the role of imagination in hypothesis.Third,Williamson's assertion that"metaphysical modal epistemology is a special case of counterfactual conditional epistemology"is acceptable,but his view that counterfactual conditional sentence knowledge is a third type of knowledge alongside a priori and empirical knowledge may not be true.

imaginationconceivabilitypossibilitycounterfactual

陈嘉明

展开 >

上海交通大学人文学院哲学系(上海200240)

厦门大学知识论与认知科学研究中心(福建厦门361005)

想象 可设想性 可能性 反事实

2024

学术月刊
上海市社会科学界联合会

学术月刊

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.846
ISSN:0439-8041
年,卷(期):2024.56(5)
  • 15