首页|中原未远:洛京留守与契丹王朝的"洛阳情结"

中原未远:洛京留守与契丹王朝的"洛阳情结"

扫码查看
新出土辽代《韩德让墓志》中载其所授洛京留守与辽代五京留守不同,系无都可守的留守,却非孤证孤例,尚有刘晞、张俭、萧孝友、许王等人曾被授予此职。洛京留守之职任经历了实际执掌且名实相符,无实际执掌亦未明言遥授和明确为遥授荣誉职衔的三个阶段,甚至在辽朝末年的《许王墓志》汉文文本中脱落"京"字,体现出契丹政治军事层面中原之志的衰减和思想底层中"洛阳情结"的延续。而此洛京留守之更为深刻的象征意义,则与洛阳独特的政治文化意蕴,辽太宗时期吞灭石晋、入主中原所形成的"洛阳经验"相系,亦须置于契丹王朝占领中原后国号、年号的更易,太宗时期多元都城格局的动态发展和洛京、中京之设等更为广泛的历史语境中加以系统性分析。澶渊之盟订立之后,契丹王朝调整洛京留守之定位、易地重建中京,中原之志渐衰;其正统意识却在觉醒,构成政治主张与思想观念间的戏剧性张力。
The Central Plains Are Not Far:The Regent of the Luo Capital and the"Luoyang Complex"of the Liao Dynasty(907-1125)
Among the titles borne by the Liao Dynasty official Han Derang(941-1011),as recorded in his recently discovered tomb inscription,is his position as"regent of the Luo capital",an appointment that his other biographies in traditionally transmitted sources do not mention.Even though the Liao Dynasty no longer controlled Luoyang at this time,other Liao officials also received this title.This paper seeks to explain the Liao rationale for continuing to appoint officials to an"empty"position that carried no actual responsibilities.It narrates the continual degradation of the position from one of actual and function responsibility,when Liao controlled Luoyang,to one that reflected a"Luoyang psychological complex",in which Liao self-image and authority were invested in nostalgia for the place that Luoyang had once commanded as the cultural and political center of the Central Plains.However,following the Chanyuan Peace Treaty with the Song in 1005,the Liao Dynasty rebuilt its central capital and redefined the position of"regent of the Luo capital."This reflected a tension between the dynasty's quest for legitimacy in the new political context and its older ideological commitments.

Han Derangthe regent of the Luo capitalLuoyang psychological complexQidan Dynastythe Central Plains

谢一峰

展开 >

湖南大学岳麓书院 湖南长沙410082

韩德让 洛京留守 洛阳情结 契丹王朝 中原

国家社会科学基金青年项目

18CZJ001

2024

学术月刊
上海市社会科学界联合会

学术月刊

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.846
ISSN:0439-8041
年,卷(期):2024.56(9)