首页|钻孔引流术和显微镜开颅血肿清除术治疗自发性皮层下脑出血的疗效对比

钻孔引流术和显微镜开颅血肿清除术治疗自发性皮层下脑出血的疗效对比

扫码查看
目的 对比分析钻孔引流与显微镜下开颅血肿清除治疗自发性皮层下脑出血的临床效果.方法 选取2021年1月—2023年1月徐州市贾汪区人民医院收治的56例皮层下脑出血患者进行回顾性分析.根据手术方式的不同,分为钻孔引流术(钻孔组)27例和显微镜开颅血肿清除术(开颅组)29例.比较两组患者手术时间、出血量、血肿清除率、术后再出血率、术后3月意识障碍情况、术后神经功能缺损情况以及预后,评价两种手术方式的临床效果.结果 与开颅组相比,钻孔组手术时间、出血量及术后再出血率均明显减少,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05).钻孔组的血肿清除率(83.62±4.88)%高于开颅组的(79.42±5.19)%,差异有统计学意义(t=3.114,P<0.05).钻孔组意识障碍程度和神经缺损程度较开颅组均较轻,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05).钻孔组病死率低于开颅组,预后较好率高于开颅组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05).结论 在自发性皮层下脑出血的手术治疗中,钻孔引流术比显微镜开颅血肿清除术更具优势,在减少手术时间、出血量以及提高血肿清除率的同时,明确降低术后再出血率,改善意识昏迷程度和神经缺损程度,降低病死率,使患者获得更好的预后.
Comparison of the Efficacy of Drilling Drainage and Microscopic Crani-otomy Hematoma Removal in the Treatment of Spontaneous Subcortical Cerebral Hemorrhage
Objective To compare and analyze the clinical effects of drilling drainage and microscopic craniotomy he-matoma removal for the treatment of spontaneous subcortical cerebral hemorrhage.Methods 56 patients with subcorti-cal cerebral hemorrhage treated in Jiawang District People's Hospital of Xuzhou City from January 2021 to January 2023 were selected for retrospective analysis.According to the different surgical methods,27 cases were divided into trepanation and drainage(drilling group)and 29 cases of microscopic craniotomy hematoma removal(craniotomy group).The operative time,blood loss,hematoma clearance rate,postoperative rebleeding rate,consciousness distur-bance 3 months after surgery,neurological impairment and prognosis of the two groups were compared,and the clini-cal effects of the two surgical methods were evaluated.Results Compared with the craniotomy group,the operation time,blood loss and postoperative rebleeding rate in the drilling group were significantly reduced,the difference were statistically significant(all P<0.05).The hematoma clearance rate of drilling group(83.62±4.88)%was higher than that of craniotomy group(79.42±5.19)%,and the difference was statistically significant(t=3.114,P<0.05).The degree of consciousness disturbance and nerve defect in the drilling group was less than that in the craniotomy group,and the difference were statistically significant(both P<0.05).The mortality rate of drilling group was lower than that of crani-otomy group,and the rate of good prognosis was higher than that of craniotomy group,the differences were statistical significance(both P<0.05).Conclusion In the surgical treatment of spontaneous subcortical cerebral hemorrhage,drilling drainage is more advantageous than microscopic craniotomy hematoma removal,which reduces the operation time and bleeding volume as well as improves the hematoma removal rate,clearly reduces the rate of postoperative re-bleeding,improves the degree of conscious coma and neurological defects,and reduces the morbidity and mortality rate,so as to make the patients have a better prognosis.

Drilling drainageCraniotomy hematoma removalSubcortical cerebral hemorrhage

袁泉、张磊、包永武

展开 >

徐州市贾汪区人民医院神经外科,江苏徐州 221011

钻孔引流术 开颅血肿清除术 皮层下脑出血

2024

系统医学

系统医学

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.9(2)
  • 15