首页|对比前外侧入路半髋关节置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的早期临床价值

对比前外侧入路半髋关节置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的早期临床价值

扫码查看
目的 分析高龄股骨颈骨折实施前外侧入路半髋关节置换术治疗的效果.方法 选取2021年10月—2023年10月汶上县人民医院收治的86例高龄股骨颈骨折患者为研究对象,均行半髋关节置换术,根据不同入路方式分为有前侧组、后侧组,各43例.前侧组行前外侧入路,后侧组行后外侧入路.比较两组骨代谢情况、临床指标、髋关节功能、并发症.结果 术后,两组骨钙素、Ⅰ型前胶原羧基端前肽以及Ⅰ型前胶原氨基端前肽均升高,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05).术后,前侧组骨钙素[(30.02±2.97)ng/mL]、Ⅰ型前胶原羧基端前肽[(27.74±3.52)ng/mL]、Ⅰ型前胶原氨基端前肽[(27.45±2.35)ng/mL]高于后侧组,差异有统计学意义(t=11.645、8.028、11.093,P均<0.05).前侧组手术时间长于后侧组,前侧组出血量、引流量低于后侧组,前侧组切口长度、下床和出院时间短于后侧组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05).两组髋关节功能优良率、并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05).结论 两种入路方式均能维持高髋关节优良率,并发症发生风险低,但在恢复周期以及骨代谢方面前外侧入路价值更高,对高龄股骨颈骨折患者更适用.
Early Clinical Value of Comparative Anterolateral Approach Hemiarthro-plasty for Treatment of Fractures of Femoral Neck in Advanced Ages
Objective To analyze the effect of implementing anterolateral approach hemiarthroplasty treatment for femoral neck fracture in advanced age.Methods A total of 86 elderly patients with femoral neck fracture admitted to Wenshang County People's Hospital from October 2021 to October 2023 were selected as the study objects,all of whom underwent semi-hip replacement.According to different approaches,they were divided into anterior and poste-rior groups with 43 cases in each group.The anterolateral approach was taken in the anterior group,and the posterolat-eral approach was taken in the posterior group.Bone metabolism,clinical indexes,hip function and complications were compared between the two groups.Results After operation,osteocalcin,carboxyl terminal propeptide of type Ⅰ procollagen and amino terminal propeptide of type Ⅰ procollagen were increased in both groups,and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).After surgery,osteocalcin[(30.02±2.97)ng/mL],carboxy-terminal propep-tide of type Ⅰ procollagen[(27.74±3.52)ng/mL],amino terminal propeptide of type Ⅰ procollagen[(27.45±2.35)ng/mL]were higher in the anterior group than in the posterior group,and the differences were statistically significant(t= 11.645,8.028,11.093,all P<0.05).The operation time of the anterior group was longer than that of the posterior group,the blood loss and drainage volume of the anterior group were lower than those of the posterior group,and the incision length,exit time and discharge time of the anterior group were shorter than those of the posterior group,and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the rate of hip function and complication between the two groups(both P>0.05).Conclusion Both approaches can maintain a high rate of hip joint excellence with a low risk of complications,but the anterolateral approach has higher value in terms of recovery cycle and bone metabolism,and is more suitable for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures.

Femoral neck fractureClinical indicatorsHemiarthroplastyBone metabolismAnterolateral approach

郭会军、王胜利

展开 >

汶上县人民医院骨科,山东济宁 272500

股骨颈骨折 临床指标 半髋关节置换术 骨代谢 前外侧入路

2024

系统医学

系统医学

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.9(3)
  • 12