首页|干化学法与尿沉渣法在尿常规检验中的诊断效能评价

干化学法与尿沉渣法在尿常规检验中的诊断效能评价

扫码查看
目的 探究尿常规检验中运用干化学法、尿沉渣法的检验价值.方法 非随机选取2023年1-12月山东省高青县妇幼保健院收治的120例疑似泌尿系感染患者为研究对象,均采用干化学法与尿沉渣法检验方法,将镜检结果作为金标准,分析不同方式诊断在尿常规中的诊断效能.结果 镜检结果阳性检出率60.00%(72/120),干化学法阳性检出率51.67%(62/120),尿沉渣法阳性检出率54.17%(65/120),联合检验阳性检出率59.17%(71/120).联合检验灵敏度、特异度、准确度高于干化学法,灵敏度、准确度高于尿沉渣法,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05).干化学法与尿沉渣法的诊断效能比较,差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05).结论 尿常规检验中,采取干化学法联合尿沉渣法可以提高诊断效能.
Evaluation of Diagnostic Efficacy of Dry Chemical Method and Urine Sedi-ment Method in Routine Urine Test
Objective To explore the value of using dry chemical method and urine sediment method in urine routine examination.Methods One hundred and twenty patients with suspected urinary tract infection admitted to Gaoqing Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Shandong Province from January to December 2023 were non-randomly se-lected as the study objects.Dry chemical method and urinary sediment method were used to test the results of micros-copy as the gold standard,and the diagnostic efficacy of different methods in urine routine diagnosis was analyzed.Results The positive detection rate was 60.00% (72/120)by microscopy,51.67% (62/120)by dry chemical method,54.17% (65/120)by urine sediment method and 59.17% (71/120)by combined test.The sensitivity,specificity and ac-curacy of the combined test were higher than that of dry chemical method,and the sensitivity and accuracy were higher than that of urine sediment method,the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).There was no sta-tistically significant difference in diagnostic efficacy between dry chemical method and urine sediment method(all P>0.05).Conclusion In urine routine examination,dry chemical method combined with urine sediment method can im-prove the diagnostic efficiency.

Urine routine testDry chemical methodUrine sediment methodDiagnostic efficacy

薛庆建

展开 >

山东省高青县妇幼保健院检验科,山东 淄博 256300

尿常规检验 干化学法 尿沉渣法 诊断效能

2024

系统医学

系统医学

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.9(15)