首页|持续气道正压通气和双水平气道正压通气治疗射血分数降低型急性心力衰竭患者的疗效对比

持续气道正压通气和双水平气道正压通气治疗射血分数降低型急性心力衰竭患者的疗效对比

扫码查看
目的 探讨持续气道正压通气(continuous positive airway pressure,CPAP)和双水平气道正压通气(bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation,BiPAP)对射血分数降低型急性心力衰竭(acute heart failure,AHF)患者的治疗效果.方法 非随机选取2022年6月—2023年12月新兴县人民医院收治的58例AHF伴射血分数降低型AHF患者为研究对象,按照治疗方法不同分为CPAP组和BiPAP组,各29例.比较两组治疗前后呼吸功能指标和血流动力学指标.结果 BiPAP组治疗后动脉氧分压高于CPAP组[(93.65±7.48)mmHg vs(89.36±7.45)mmHg],动脉二氧化碳分压低于CPAP组[(35.06±4.01)mmHg vs(39.54±3.68)mmHg],差异有统计学意义(t=2.188、4.433,P均<0.05).治疗后,两组全心舒张末期容积指数、血管外肺水指数均随时间的推移明显降低,与治疗前相比,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05).但两组间上述指标对比,差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05).结论 与CPAP相比,BiPAP可更好地改善AHF患者的呼吸功能,二者均不会对患者的血流动力学产生明显的不良影响.
Comparison of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation and Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Heart Failure with Decreased Ejection Fraction
Objective To investigate the therapeutic effects of continuous positive airway pressure(CPAP)and bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation(BiPAP)in patients with acute heart failure with reduced ejection fraction acute heart failure(AHF)patients with reduced ejection fraction.Methods Fifty-eight patients with AHF accompa-nied by decreased ejection fraction admitted to Xinxing County People's Hospital from June 2022 to December 2023 were non-randomly selected as the study subjects.They were divided into CPAP group and BiPAP group according to different treatment methods,with twenty-nine patients in each group.Compare the respiratory function indicators and hemodynamic indicators between two groups before and after treatment.Results After treatment,the arterial oxygen partial pressure in the BiPAP group was higher than that in the CPAP group[(93.65±7.48)mmHg vs(89.36±7.45)mmHg],the arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure was lower than that in the CPAP group[(35.06±4.01)mmHg vs(39.54±3.68)mmHg],the differences were statistically significant(t=2.188,4.433,both P<0.05).After treatment,both groups showed a significant decrease in end diastolic volume index and extravascular lung water index over time,the differences were statistically significant compared to before treatment(both P<0.05).However,there was no statisti-cally significant difference in the above indicators between the two groups(all P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with CPAP,BiPAP can improve the respiratory function of patients with acute heart failure,reduce the ejaculation fraction,and has no significant adverse effect on the hemodynamics of patients.

Continuous positive airway pressureBi-level positive airway pressure ventilationEjection fraction decreased typeAcute heart failureCurative effect analysis

郑李龙、何晃养、严家兴、李泽茂、梁瑜、刘歆、刘维强、张丽荣

展开 >

新兴县人民医院急诊科,广东 新兴 527400

新兴县人民医院心内科,广东 新兴 527400

持续气道正压通气 双水平气道正压通气 射血分数降低型 急性心衰 疗效分析

云浮市医学科学技术研究项目

2022B083

2024

系统医学

系统医学

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.9(17)
  • 7