首页|经皮桡动脉穿刺与股动脉穿刺在高龄冠心病患者冠脉介入治疗中的应用效果分析

经皮桡动脉穿刺与股动脉穿刺在高龄冠心病患者冠脉介入治疗中的应用效果分析

扫码查看
目的 比较高龄冠心病患者应用经皮桡动脉穿刺与股动脉穿刺行冠脉介入的应用效果。方法 选择2021年6月至2023年11月我院收治的高龄冠心病患者开展研究,总病例210例,按照介入治疗采取穿刺方式的不同,分为桡动脉组和股动脉组,各105例。桡动脉组经皮行桡动脉穿刺,股动脉组经皮行股动脉穿刺。对比两组穿刺指标、手术情况、恢复情况及并发症发生情况。结果 两组的穿刺指标对比:桡动脉组的平均穿刺次数更低,穿刺成功时间更长,鞘管植入时间和出血时间更短,差异有统计学意义(P均<0。05);两组的手术情况对比:桡动脉组的一次性穿刺成功率、造影成功率、手术成功率均高于股动脉组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0。05);两组恢复情况对比:桡动脉组术后第1 d、3 d的VAS评分和住院时间均低于股动脉组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0。05);两组术后并发症发生率对比,桡动脉组(3。81%)低于对照组(11。43%),差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 经皮桡动脉穿刺与股动脉穿刺均可作为高龄冠心病患者的冠脉介入治疗手段,相较而言,经皮桡动脉穿刺在高龄冠心病患者中更具优势,具有一次性穿刺成功率高、鞘管植入时间和出血时间短、术后恢复快、并发症发生风险低等优点。
Application Effect of Percutaneous Radial Artery Puncture versus Femoral Artery Puncture in Coronary Intervention for Elderly Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Objective To investigate the application effect of percutaneous radial artery puncture versus femoral artery puncture in coronary intervention for elderly patients with coronary artery disease.Methods A total of 210 elderly patients with coronary artery disease who were admitted to Changle District People's Hospital from June 2021 to November 2023 were enrolled,and according to the procedure for puncture in interventional treatment,they were divided into radial artery group and femoral artery group,with 105 patients in each group.The patients in the radial artery group received radial artery puncture,and those in the femoral artery group received femoral artery puncture.The two groups were compared in terms of puncture indicators,surgical conditions,recovery,and complications.Results As for the puncture indicators,compared with the femoral artery group,the radial artery group had a significantly lower average number of punctures,a significantly longer time to successful puncture,a significantly shorter time of sheath implantation,and a significantly shorter bleeding time(all P<0.05).As for the surgical conditions,compared with the femoral artery group,the radial artery group had a significantly higher first-attempt success rate of puncture and significantly higher success rates of imaging and surgery(all P<0.05).As for the condition of recovery,compared with the femoral artery group,the radial artery group had a significantly lower Visual Analogue Scale score on days 1 and 3 after surgery and a significantly shorter length of hospital stay(all P<0.05).The radial artery group had a significantly lower incidence rate of postoperative complications than the femoral artery group(3.81%vs 11.43%,P<0.05).Conclusion Both percutaneous radial artery puncture and femoral artery puncture can be used in coronary intervention for elderly patients with coronary artery disease.In comparison,percutaneous radial artery puncture has more advantages in elderly patients with coronary artery disease,such as a high first-attempt success rate of puncture,a short time of sheath implantation and bleeding,fast postoperative recovery,and a low risk of complications.

Coronary arteryElderly patientsInterventional therapyPercutaneous radial artery punctureFemoral artery puncture

罗学楚、王国坤

展开 >

福州市长乐区人民医院,福建福州 350200

冠心病 高龄 介入治疗 经皮桡动脉穿刺 股动脉穿刺

2024

心血管病防治知识
广东介入心脏学会 广东岭南心血管病研究所

心血管病防治知识

影响因子:0.592
ISSN:1672-3015
年,卷(期):2024.14(1)
  • 15