心血管康复医学杂志2024,Vol.33Issue(6) :771-775.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0074.2024.06.25

左束支区域起搏对慢性收缩性心力衰竭患者左心室收缩同步性、预后的影响

Influence of left bundle branch area pacing on left ventricular systolic synchronization and prognosis in patients with chronic systolic heart failure

汪敏 钱钧
心血管康复医学杂志2024,Vol.33Issue(6) :771-775.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0074.2024.06.25

左束支区域起搏对慢性收缩性心力衰竭患者左心室收缩同步性、预后的影响

Influence of left bundle branch area pacing on left ventricular systolic synchronization and prognosis in patients with chronic systolic heart failure

汪敏 1钱钧1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 德驭医疗马鞍山总医院心血管内科,安徽马鞍山 243000
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:探究左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)对慢性收缩性心力衰竭患者左心室收缩同步性、预后的影响.方法:根据不同起搏方式将德驭医疗马鞍山总医院2020年6月~2021年12月收治的110例慢性收缩性心力衰竭患者分为LBBAP组(60例)与右心室起搏(RVP)组(50例).对比两组手术前、3个月后起搏参数、心功能、左室收缩同步性等相关指标及6个月后的预后情况.结果:术后3个月,与RVP组比较,LBBAP组起搏阻抗[(560.34±61.32)Ω 比(507.20±44.29)Ω]、QRS 时限[(132.57±22.91)ms 比(123.61±20.55)ms]以及左心室收缩同步性参数中峰值应变离散度(PSD)[(58.24±10.57)ms比(45.30±6.20)ms]、纵向收缩应变达峰时间差(Tls-Dif)[(238.57±50.13)ms 比(152.42±40.15)ms]、横向收缩同步性标准差(Trs-SD)[(122.35±9.14)ms比(78.18±5.46)ms]、前间隔 左心室后壁收缩期径向应变达峰时间差(Tas-post)[(138.19±20.36)ms比(69.14±20.45)ms]均显著减少,左室射血分数(LVEF)[(46.62±5.80)%比(50.54±5.68)%]显著提高(P<0.05或<0.01).LBBAP组术后6个月心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)有反应比例显著高于RVP组(88.33%比72.00%,P=0.030),两组心衰再入院率、全因死亡率对比均无明显差异(P均>0.05).结论:LBBAP能有效改善慢性收缩性心力衰竭患者心功能,保证左心室收缩的同步性,CRT有反应率高,预后较好.

Abstract

Objective:This study aims to investigate the influence of left bundle branch area pacing(LBBAP)on left ventricular systolic synchronization and prognosis in patients with chronic systolic heart failure.Methods:According to different pacing methods,a total of 110 patients with chronic systolic heart failure admitted in Maanshan General Hospital of Ranger-Duree Healthcare between June 2020 and December 2021 were divided into LBBAP group(n=60)and right ventricular pacing(RVP)group(n=50).Pacing parameters,cardiac function,left ventricular systol-ic synchronization related indexes before and 3 months after operation,and prognosis after 6 months were compared between two groups.Results:Compared with patients in RVP group 3 months after operation,those in LBBAP group had significant lower pacing impedance[(560.34±61.32)Ω vs.(507.20±44.29)Ω],QRS duration[(132.57±22.91)ms vs.(123.61±20.55)ms],peak strain dispersion(PSD)[(58.24±10.57)ms vs.(45.30±6.20)ms],time to longitudinal systolic strain difference(Tls-Dif)[(238.57±50.13)ms vs.(152.42±40.15)ms],transverse systolic strain difference(Trs-SD)[(122.35±9.14)ms vs.(78.18±5.46)ms]and time to aor-tic systolic strain posterior(Tas-post)[(138.19±20.36)ms vs.(69.14±20.45)ms],and significant higher left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)[(46.62±5.80)%vs.(50.54±5.68)%](P<0.05 or<0.01).Proportion of positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy(CRT)after 6 months in LBBAP group was significantly higher than that of RVP group(88.33%vs.72.00%,P=0.030).There were no significant difference in heart failure-caused rehospitalization rate and all-cause mortality between two groups(P>0.05 both).Conclusion:LB-BAP could effectively improve cardiac function,ensure the synchronization of left ventricular contraction,with high CRT response rate and good prognosis in patients with chronic systolic heart failure.

关键词

心力衰竭,收缩性/心脏起搏,人工/心脏再同步疗法

Key words

Heart failure,systolic/Cardiac pacing,artificial/Cardiac resynchronization therapy

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
心血管康复医学杂志
福建省康复医学会 中国康复医学会

心血管康复医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.157
ISSN:1008-0074
段落导航相关论文