首页|政治思想史研究的时空坐标及其可能转换——基于三种方法论进路的比较

政治思想史研究的时空坐标及其可能转换——基于三种方法论进路的比较

扫码查看
政治思想史研究必然涉及情境、问题、文本、思想家、研究者诸要素.对这些要素的不同侧重,依据不同的知识脉络传统,形成政治思想史研究的不同时空坐标系.运用去时空化、再时空化、时空变迁的时空坐标分析框架,比较三种成熟的政治思想史方法论进路,即以施特劳斯为代表的文本主义研究、以斯金纳为代表的历史语境主义研究与以科塞雷克为代表的概念史研究,可知,三种时空坐标图式对诸要素的不同侧重有各自理据,对政治思想史研究有共识、分歧与融合,亦可有条件地转换.这有助于在方法论层面丰富和扩展当下及未来的政治思想史研究.
Temporal-Spatial Coordinates of Political Thought History Research and Their Potential Transformation:Based on a Comparative Analysis of Three Methodological Approaches
Political thought history research inevitably involves elements such as contexts,issues,texts,thinkers,and researchers.Different emphases on these elements,based on different knowledge traditions,form different temporal-spatial coordinates for the study of the history of political thought.This article uses a temporal-spatial coordinate analysis framework of de-spatiotemporal,re-spatiotemporal,and spatiotemporal change to compare three mature methodological approaches of political thought history,namely,text-oriented research represented by Leo Strauss,historical contextualism represented by Quentin Skinner,and conceptual history research represented by Reinhart Koselleck.It can be seen that the three coordinate system schemas have their own justifications for different emphases on these elements,leading to consensus,divergence,and integration in the study of the history of political thought.Furthermore,they can also be conditionally trans-formed,enriching and expanding the research on the history of political thought at the methodological level for the present and future.

The history of political thoughtResearch methodology of the history of political thoughtTime-space conversion

郭台辉、魏德伟

展开 >

云南大学民族政治学院,云南昆明,650091

云南大学政府管理学院,云南昆明,650091

政治思想史 政治思想史研究方法论 时空转换

2024

学习与实践

学习与实践

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.(7)