首页|侵犯网络交易秩序行为的类型化展开与刑法规制

侵犯网络交易秩序行为的类型化展开与刑法规制

扫码查看
正向刷单行为与反向刷单行为是两种典型的侵犯网络交易秩序的行为,二者在行为方式、行为效果上存在差异.非法经营罪不能妥当评价正向刷单行为,而将反向刷单行为定性为破坏生产经营罪有违罪刑法定原则.在现行刑法的规范供给内,适用虚假广告罪论处正向刷单行为、适用损害商业信誉罪评价反向刷单行为,是可供选择的权宜之计.规制侵犯网络交易秩序行为的理想路径,是在刑法分则第三章"扰乱市场秩序罪"一节中增设"组织虚构网络交易罪",将该罪界定为目的犯,并在罪状设计、法定刑配置方面协调好刑法与前置法的关系.
The Stereotype Expansion and Criminal Law Regulation of Behaviors that Violate the Order of Online Transactions
Positive brushing behaviors and reverse brushing behaviors are two typical behaviors that vio-late the order of online transactions,and there are differences in their behavior patterns and effects.The crime of illegal business operation cannot properly evaluates the behavior of positive brushing orders and speculating on trust,and characterizing the behavior of reverse brushing orders as the crime of disrupting production and operation violates the rule of crime that confirmed by law.Within the current regulations supply of Chinese Criminal Law,applying the crime of false advertising to punish positive brushing behaviors and applying the crime of damaging commercial reputation to evaluate reverse brushing behaviors are an optional expedient mea-sure.The ideal path to regulate behaviors that violate the order of online transactions is to add the crime of"or-ganizing fictitious online transactions"in the"Crimes of Disrupting Market Order"section of Chapter 3 of spe-cific provisions of Chinese Criminal Law,defining this crime as a purposive offense,and coordinating the rela-tionship between criminal law and pre-existing laws in terms of the design of the fact about the crime and the allocation of statutory sentence.

Positive brushing behaviorsReverse brushing behaviorsFair competition orderThe crime of organizing fictitious online transactions

耿立峰、连赛君

展开 >

内蒙古财经大学法学院,内蒙古呼和浩特,010070

北京物资学院法学院,北京,101100

正向刷单行为 反向刷单行为 公平竞争秩序 组织虚构网络交易罪

2024

学习与实践

学习与实践

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.(11)