首页|不同侧支循环状态下直接取栓与桥接取栓治疗急性前循环大血管闭塞性脑卒中疗效及安全性比较

不同侧支循环状态下直接取栓与桥接取栓治疗急性前循环大血管闭塞性脑卒中疗效及安全性比较

Comparison of efficacy and safety of direct thrombectomy and bridging thrombectomy in the treat-ment of acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke under different collateral circulation statuses

扫码查看
目的 比较不同侧支循环下直接取栓与桥接取栓治疗急性前循环大血管闭塞性脑卒中的疗效及安全性.方法 选择2020年9月至2023年3月新乡医学院第一附属医院收治的93例急性前循环缺血性卒中患者为研究对象.根据取栓治疗方法将患者分为直接取栓术组(n=47)和桥接取栓组(n=46);直接取栓术组患者采用血管内直接取栓术治疗,桥接取栓组患者采用阿替普酶静脉溶栓联合机械取栓术.应用计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)行侧支循环Tan分级,依据Tan分级将患者分为侧支循环良好组与侧支循环较差组.应用改良脑梗死溶栓分级(mTICI)评估血管再通;术后24~48 h行头颅平扫CT评估是否有出血转化;术后90 d行卒中改良Rankin量表评分.记录患者入院后影像学检查时间、股动脉穿刺时间、手术取栓血管再通时间,以及预后和自发非创伤性症状性脑出血(SICH)发生情况等.结果 2组患者的年龄、性别、基线阿尔伯塔脑卒中计划早期诊断(ASPECT)评分、基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、合并高血压占比、合并糖尿病占比、合并心房颤动占比、基线收缩压、肌酐、基线血糖、血小板计数、闭塞部位、脑卒中病因、侧支循环状态比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).直接取栓组与桥接取栓组患者入院后影像学检查时间、股动脉穿刺时间、手术取栓血管再通时间、血管再通率、预后良好率、病死率、SICH发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);直接取栓组患者出血转化率显著低于桥接取栓组(P<0.05).直接取栓组与桥接取栓组侧支循环良好和侧支循环较差患者的入院后影像学检查时间、股动脉穿刺时间、手术取栓血管再通时间、血管再通率、预后良好率、病死率、SICH发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);直接取栓组侧支循环良好和侧支循环较差患者的出血转化率显著低于桥接取栓组(P<0.05).结论 在不同侧支循环状态下,直接取栓与桥接取栓治疗急性前循环大血管闭塞性脑卒中患者的疗效及安全性相似,但桥接取栓较直接取栓更易发生脑出血转化.
Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of direct thrombectomy versus bridging thrombectomy in the treatment of acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke under different collateral circulation statuses.Methods Totally 93 patients with acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University from September 2020 to March 2023 were selected as the research subjects.Patients were divided into direct throm-bectomy group(n=47)and bridging thrombectomy group(n=46)based on the type of thrombectomy.Patients in the direct thrombectomy group received direct intravascular thrombectomy,while patients in the bridging thrombectomy group received intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase combined with mechanical thrombectomy.According computed tomography angiography,the collateral circulation Tan classification was applied to divide the patients into good collateral circulation sub-group and poor collateral circulation sub-group.The modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grading(mTICI)was used to evaluate vessel recanalization.Head computed tomography plain scan was performed at 24-48 hours postoperatively to assess if there was hemorrhagic transformation,and modified Rankin Scale score was performed at 90 days postoperatively.Information such as imaging examination time,femoral artery puncture time,vessel recanalization time after thrombectomy,prognosis and spontaneous non-traumatic symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage(SICH)were collected.Results The age,gender,baseline Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score,baseline national institutes of health stroke scale score,proportions of hypertension,diabetes and atrial fibrillation,baseline systolic pressure,creatinine,baseline blood glucose,platelet count,occlusion site,stroke etiologies and collateral circulation status of patients in the two groups were not statistically significantly different(P>0.05).There were no significant differences in the post-admission imaging examination time,femoral artery puncture time,vessel recanalization time after thrombectomy,successful vascular reperfusion rate,good prognosis rate,mortality rate,and SICH incidence between the two groups(P>0.05).The hemorrhagic transformation rate of patients in the direct thrombectomy group was significantly lower than that in the bridging thrombectomy group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the post-admission imaging examination time,femoral artery puncture time,vessel recanalization time after thrombectomy,successful vascular reperfusion rate,good prognosis rate,mortality rate,and SICH incidence between patients with good collateral circulation and patients with poor collateral circulation in the two groups(P>0.05).The hemorrhagic transformation rate of patients with good and poor collateral circulation in the direct thrombectomy group was significantly lower than that in the bridging thrombectomy group(P<0.05).Conclusion Under different collateral circulation conditions,the safety and efficacy of direct thrombectomy and bridging thrombectomy in the treatment of acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke are similar,but bridging thrombectomy is more likely to result in cerebral hemorrhage transformation compared with direct thrombectomy.

strokecollateral circulationdirect thrombectomybridging thrombectomy

高宇、李子昂、张健、刘韩鹏、张平、闫瑞芳、岳军艳、崔红凯

展开 >

新乡医学院第一附属医院神经介入科,河南 卫辉 453100

新乡医学院第一附属医院神经内科,河南 卫辉 453100

新乡医学院第一附属医院磁共振科,河南 卫辉 453100

新乡医学院第一附属医院放射科,河南 卫辉 453100

展开 >

卒中 侧支循环 直接取栓 桥接取栓

河南省科技厅科技攻关项目河南省医学科技攻关联合共建项目

212102310835LHGJ20220629

2024

新乡医学院学报
新乡医学院

新乡医学院学报

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.999
ISSN:1004-7239
年,卷(期):2024.41(2)
  • 28