首页|艾司氯胺酮在全髋关节置换术麻醉诱导中的应用效果

艾司氯胺酮在全髋关节置换术麻醉诱导中的应用效果

The application effect of esketamine on anesthesia induction in total hip replacement

扫码查看
目的 探讨艾司氯胺酮用于全髋关节置换术麻醉诱导的效果.方法 选择2021年10月至2022年6月新乡医学院第一附属医院收治的60例全身麻醉下行全髋关节置换术的患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法将患者分为对照组和观察组,每组30例.观察组患者在麻醉诱导时给予艾司氯胺酮0.5 mg·kg-1,对照组患者给予安慰剂,其余诱导用药及术中维持用药均相同.记录并比较2组患者入室后(T0)、麻醉诱导给药后(T1)、气管插管后(T2)、缝合皮肤时(T3)的心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)和脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2);比较2组患者麻醉苏醒时间、麻醉后监测治疗(PACU)停留时间;分别于术后2、6、12、24 h时采用Ramasy镇静评分和疼痛数字等级评分(NRS)评估患者的镇静程度和疼痛程度;比较2组患者术后躁动、恶心呕吐、呼吸抑制等不良反应发生情况.结果 T0、T2、T3时,2组患者的HR、MAP比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);T1时观察组患者的HR、MAP显著高于对照组(P<0.05).T0、T1、T2、T3时,2组患者的SpO2比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).2组患者PACU停留时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者麻醉苏醒时间显著短于对照组(P<0.05).观察组患者术后2 h时的Ramasy镇静评分显著高于对照组,NRS评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05);术后6、12、24 h时,2组患者的Ramasy镇静评分和NRS评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).对照组和观察组患者术后不良反应发生率分别为13.3%(4/30)、6.7%(2/30),2组患者术后不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(x2=0.741,P>0.05).结论 艾司氯胺酮可减轻行全髋关节置换术患者术后疼痛,缩短麻醉苏醒时间,使血流动力学更加稳定,且安全性较高.
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of esketamine on anesthesia induction in total hip replacement.Methods A total of 60 patients undergoing total hip replacement under general anesthesia in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University from October 2021 to June 2022 were selected as the research subjects.According to the random number table method,the patients were divided into the control group and the observation group,with 30 patients in each group.Patients in the observation group were given esketamine(0.5 mg·kg-1)during anesthesia induction,patients in the control group were given placebo,and other induction drugs and intraoperative maintenance drugs used in the two groups were the same.The heart rate(HR),mean arterial pressure(MAP)and blood oxygen saturation(SpO2)were recorded and compared between the two groups after entry into the operating room(T0),after anesthesia induction(T1),after endotracheal intubation(T2),and at skin suturing(T3).The anesthesia recovery time and post-anesthesia care unit(PACU)residence time of patients in the two groups were recorded and compared.The sedation and pain levels of patients were evaluated by the Ramasy sedation scale(RSS)and numerical rating scale(NRS)at 2,6,12,and 24 hours after operation.The incidence of adverse reactions,such as postoperative agitation,nausea and vomiting,and respiratory depression,was compared between the two groups.Results No significant difference was found in HR and MAP between the two groups at T0,T2 and T3(P>0.05).HR and MAP of patients in the observation group at T,were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in SpO2 between the two groups at T0,T1,T2 and T3(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in PACU residence time between the two groups(P>0.05).The anesthesia recovery time of patients in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group(P<0.05).The RSS score of patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group at 2 hours after surgery,but the NRS score of patients in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group at 2 hours after surgery(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in RSS and NRS scores between the two groups at 6,12 and 24 hours after surgery(P>0.05).The incidence of postoperative adverse reactions in the control and observation groups was 13.3%(4/30)and 6.7%(2/30),respectively.There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups(x2=0.741,P>0.05).Conclusion Esketamine can reduce the pain after total hip replacement,shorten the time to recovery from anesthesia,and make hemodynamics more stable,showing higher safety.

esketaminetotal hip replacementanesthesia induction

杨孟丽、张雪莹、杨鑫、李晓芳、张红伟、樊腾、马闻苛、杨明月、高宁宁、王玉淼、郭自伟、殷婕、岳修勤

展开 >

新乡医学院第一附属医院麻醉科,河南 卫辉 453100

艾司氯胺酮 全髋关节置换术 麻醉诱导

国家自然科学基金面上项目河南省医学科技攻关计划省部共建项目河南省高等学校重点科研项目

81870926SBGJ201805418B310020

2024

新乡医学院学报
新乡医学院

新乡医学院学报

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.999
ISSN:1004-7239
年,卷(期):2024.41(4)
  • 13