首页|V形双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗老年退行性腰椎滑脱症疗效观察

V形双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗老年退行性腰椎滑脱症疗效观察

Clinical efficacy of V-shape bichannel spinal endoscopy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in elderly patients

扫码查看
目的 探讨V形双通道脊柱内镜技术(VBE)治疗老年退行性腰椎滑脱症(DLS)的临床效果.方法 选择2017年6月至2023年4月武安市第一人民医院收治的110例DLS患者为研究对象.根据手术方案将患者分为微创经椎间孔椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)组和VBE组,每组55例.记录2组患者手术切口长度、手术时间、X线透视次数、术中出血量、住院时间、卧床时间等术中及术后一般指标;分别于术前及术后3、6个月采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估腰背、腿疼痛程度,采用Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评估患者的腰椎功能;术后3个月采用Brantigan评分评估患者骨粒融合情况;术前及术后3、6个月拍摄X线片,测量患者的手术节段椎体滑移度、椎间隙高度、滑脱角、矢状面Cobb角;术后6个月采用日本整形外科学会(JOA)评分评估患者腰椎功能优良率;记录2组患者术后并发症发生情况.结果 VBE组患者的手术切口长度、手术时间、卧床时间、住院时间显著短于MIS-TLIF组,术中出血量、X线透视次数显著少于MIS-TLIF组(P<0.05).术前,2组患者腰背痛VAS评分、腿痛VAS评分、ODI指数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者术后3、6个月腰背痛VAS评分、腿痛VAS评分、ODI指数均显著低于术前(P<0.05);术后3、6个月,VBE组与MIS-TLIF组患者腰背痛VAS评分、腿痛VAS评分、ODI指数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).VBE组与MIS-TLIF组患者Brantigan评分分布比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术前,2组患者手术节段矢状面Cobb角、椎间隙高度、滑脱角、椎体滑移度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).2组患者术后3、6个月手术节段矢状面Cobb角、椎间隙高度显著高于术前(P<0.05),滑脱角、椎体滑移度显著低于术前(P<0.05);术后3、6个月,2组患者手术节段矢状面Cobb角、椎间隙高度、滑脱角、椎体滑移度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后6个月,VBE组与MIS-TLIF组患者腰椎功能优良率分别为100.00%(55/55)、98.18%(54/55),2组患者腰椎功能优良率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后,VBE组患者未出现并发症,MIS-TLIF组1例患者出现切口渗出和延迟愈合.结论 VBE治疗老年DLS在腰椎形态、功能恢复及安全性方面效果与MIS-TLIF相当,但VBE能减轻组织损伤,使患者及早下床活动,缩短患者术后早期恢复进程.
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of V-shape bichannel spinal endoscopy(VBE)in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis(DLS)in elderly patients.Methods A total of 110 patients with DLS admitted to Wu'an First People's Hospital from June 2017 to April 2023 were selected as the research subjects.According to the surgical plan,these patients were divided into the minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF)group and the VBE group,with 55 patients in each group.The general indicators of patients in the two groups during and after surgery,inclu-ding the length of the surgical incision,operation time,number of X-ray fluoroscopy,intraoperative blood loss,hospitalization time,and bed rest time were recorded.Before surgery and three,six months after surgery,the visual analogue scale(VAS)was used to assess the degree of pain in the back and legs,and the Oswestry disability index(ODI)was used to assess the lumbar function of the patients.The Brantigan score was used to assess bone fusion in patients at three months after surgery.X-ray films were taken before surgery and three,six months after surgery to measure the spondylolisthesis degree,intervertebral height,spondylolisthesis angle,and sagittal Cobb angle at the surgical segment.The Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)score was used to assess the excellent and good rate of lumbar function in patients at six months after surgery.The incidence of postoperative complications of patients in both groups was recorded.Results The length of surgical incision,operation time,bed rest time,and hospitalization time of patients in the VBE group were significantly shorter than those in the MIS-TLIF group,and the intraoperative blood loss and X-ray fluoroscopy times were significantly less than those in the MIS-TLIF group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS scores for low back pain and leg pain and ODI index between the two groups before surgery(P>0.05).The VAS scores for low back pain and leg pain and the ODI index of patients in both groups at three and six months after surgery were significantly lower than those before surgery(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the VAS scores for low back pain and leg pain and ODI index between the VBE group and the MIS-TLIF group at three and six months after surgery(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the distribution of Brantigan scores of patients between the VBE group and the MIS-TLIF group(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the sagittal Cobb angle,intervertebral height,spondylolisthesis angle,and spondylolisthesis degree at the surgical segment of patients between the two groups before surgery(P>0.05).The sagittal Cobb angle and intervertebral height at the surgical segment of patients in both groups at three and six months after surgery were significantly higher than those before surgery(P<0.05),while the spondylolisthesis angle and spondylolisthesis degree were significantly lower than those before surgery(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the sagittal Cobb angle,intervertebral height,spondylolisthesis angle and spondylolisthesis degree at the surgical segment of patients between the two groups at three and six months after surgery(P>0.05).At six months after surgery,the excellent and good rate of lumbar function in the VBE group and the MIS-TLIF group was 100.00%(55/55)and 98.18%(54/55),respectively.There was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate of lumbar function between the two groups(P>0.05).No complications occurred in patients in the VBE group after surgery,while one patient in the MIS-TLIF group experienced incision exudation and delayed healing.Conclusion VBE treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in elderly patients shows similar efficacy with MIS-TLIF in terms of lumbar morphology,functional recovery,and safety.However,VBE can reduce tissue damage,enable earlier ambulation,and thereby accelerate the early postoperative recovery process.

degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesisminimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionV-shape bichannel spinal endoscopydegree of painfusion situationlumbar anatomic parameterslumbar spine functioncomplication

李雷、庞超见、赵新亮

展开 >

武安市第一人民医院骨三科,河北 武安 056300

邯郸市第一医院骨科,河北 邯郸 056002

退行性腰椎滑脱症 微创经椎间孔椎体间融合术 V形双通道脊柱内镜技术 疼痛程度 融合情况 腰椎解剖参数 腰椎功能 并发症

邯郸市科学技术研究与发展计划项目

19422083053ZC

2024

新乡医学院学报
新乡医学院

新乡医学院学报

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.999
ISSN:1004-7239
年,卷(期):2024.41(7)