首页|多层螺旋CT增强扫描联合CT纹理分析在卵巢癌术前国际妇产科联盟分期诊断中的价值

多层螺旋CT增强扫描联合CT纹理分析在卵巢癌术前国际妇产科联盟分期诊断中的价值

Value of multi-slice spiral CT enhanced scanning combined with CT texture analysis in preoperative International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging of ovarian cancer

扫码查看
目的 探讨多层螺旋CT增强扫描联合CT纹理分析在卵巢癌术前国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期诊断中的价值.方法 选择2021年3月至2023年9月北京市通州区妇幼保健院及首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院收治的126例卵巢癌患者为研究对象.术前患者均接受多层螺旋CT增强扫描,测量CT值;采用Kinetics软件进行CT纹理分析,计算纹理特征相关参数,包括偏度、峰度、方差、熵、逆差距.比较不同FIGO分期患者的CT值及CT纹理特征相关参数;应用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线评估CT增强扫描、CT纹理分析及二者联合对术前卵巢癌FIGO分期的诊断效能,Cohen's Kappa系数分析CT增强扫描、CT纹理分析及二者联合诊断卵巢癌FIGO分期与卵巢癌FIGO分期病理诊断的一致性.结果 FIGO分期Ⅳ期患者的CT值和熵值显著大于FIGO分期Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期患者,FIGO分期Ⅲ期患者的CT值和熵值显著大于FIGO分期Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期患者(P<0.05);FIGO分期Ⅰ期与Ⅱ期患者的CT值和熵值比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).不同FIGO分期患者的偏度、峰度、方差和逆差距比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).ROC曲线分析结果显示,以Ⅰ~Ⅱ期为参考,当CT值、熵值截断值为74.645、9.540时,CT值、熵值诊断FIGOⅢ期的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.733、0.743,特异度分别为0.760、0.800,敏感度分别为0.605、0.674;CT值联合熵值诊断FIGO Ⅲ期的AUC为0.818,特异度为0.820,敏感度为0.721.当CT值、熵值截断值为77.095、10.020时,诊断FIGO Ⅳ期的AUC分别为0.817、0.797,特异度分别为0.820、0.820,敏感度分别为0.545、0.667;二者联合诊断FIGO Ⅳ期的AUC为0.926,特异度为0.900,敏感度为0.758.CT增强扫描诊断卵巢癌FIGO分期与病理诊断的一致性中等(Kappa=0.580,P<0.05),准确率为72.22%(91/126);CT纹理分析诊断卵巢癌FIGO分期与病理诊断的一致性中等(Kappa=0.598,P<0.05),准确率为73.81%(93/126);CT增强扫描联合CT纹理分析诊断卵巢癌FIGO分期与病理诊断具有极高一致性(Kappa=0.868,P<0.05),准确率为91.27%.结论 多层螺旋CT增强扫描与CT纹理分析均是卵巢癌FIGO分期诊断的可靠方法,CT增强扫描联合CT纹理分析诊断卵巢癌FIGO分期与病理诊断具有极高一致性,能提高卵巢癌FIGO分期的诊断效能.
Objective To investigate the value of multi-slice spiral CT enhanced scanning combined with CT texture analysis in preoperative International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO)staging of ovarian cancer.Methods A total of 126 ovarian cancer patients admitted to the Tongzhou District Maternal and Child Health Hospital and Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University from March 2021 to September 2023 were selected as the research subjects.All patients underwent multi-slice spiral CT enhanced scanning,and their CT values were measured.Kinetics software was employed for CT texture analysis,and the texture feature-related parameters,including skewness,kurtosis,variance,entropy,and inverse difference,were calculated.The CT values and CT texture feature-related parameters among patients with different FIGO stages were compared.The diagnostic efficacy of CT enhanced scanning,CT texture analysis,and their combination in preoperative FIGO staging of ovarian cancer was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve,and the consistency between the diagnosis of FIGO stage of ovarian cancer based on CT enhanced scanning,CT texture analysis,and their combination and the pathological diagnosis of FIGO stage of ovarian cancer was evaluated by Cohen's Kappa coefficient analysis.Results The CT value and entropy value of FIGO stage Ⅳ patients were significantly higher than those of FIGO stage Ⅰ,Ⅱ,and Ⅲpatients,and the CT value and entropy value of FIGO stage Ⅲ patients were significantly higher than those of FIGO stage Ⅰand Ⅱ patients(P<0.05);there was no statistically significant difference in the CT value and entropy value between FIGO stage Ⅰ and stage Ⅱ patients(P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in skewness,kurtosis,variance,and inverse difference among patients with different FIGO stages(P>0.05).The ROC curve analysis showed that with reference to FIGO stages Ⅰ and Ⅱ,when the cut-off values of CT value and entropy value were 74.645 and 9.540,respectively,the area under the curve(AUC)of CT value and entropy value in diagnosing FIGO stage Ⅲ was 0.733 and 0.743,respectively,the specificity was 0.760 and 0.800,respectively,and the sensitivity was 0.605 and 0.674,respectively;the area under the curve(AUC)of CT value combined with entropy value in diagnosing FIGO stage Ⅲ was 0.818,the specificity was 0.820,and the sensitivity was 0.721.When the cut-off values of CT value and entropy value were 77.095 and 10.020,respectively,the AUC of CT value and entropy value in diagnosing FIGO stage Ⅳ was 0.817 and 0.797,respectively,the specificity was 0.820 and 0.820,respectively,and the sensitivity was 0.545 and 0.667,respectively;the AUC of CT value combined with entropy value in diagnosing FIGO stage Ⅳ was 0.926,the specificity was 0.900,and the sensitivity was 0.758.The consistency between CT enhanced scanning and pathology in diagnosing FIGO stage of ovarian cancer was moderate(Kappa=0.580,P<0.05),with an accuracy rate of 72.22%(91/126);the consistency between CT texture analysis and pathology in diagnosing FIGO stage of ovarian cancer was moderate(Kappa=0.598,P<0.05),with an accuracy rate of 73.81%(93/126);the combination of CT enhanced scanning and CT texture analysis in the diagnosis of FIGO stage of ovarian cancer had a high consistency with pathological diagnosis(Kappa=0.868,P<0.05),with an accuracy rate of 91.27%.Conclusion Multi-slice spiral CT enhanced scanning and CT texture analysis are both reliable methods for the diagnosis of FIGO stage of ovarian cancer.The combination of CT enhanced scanning and CT texture analysis in the diagnosis of FIGO stage of ovarian cancer has a high consistency with pathological diagnosis.The combination of the two can improve the diagnostic efficiency for FIGO stage of ovarian cancer.

ovarian cancerCT enhanced scanningCT texture analysisstaging diagnosis

岳强、尉建安、刘士杰、胡晓春

展开 >

北京市通州区妇幼保健院放射科,北京 101100

首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院放射介入科,北京 101100

卵巢癌 CT增强扫描 CT纹理分析 分期诊断

2024

新乡医学院学报
新乡医学院

新乡医学院学报

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.999
ISSN:1004-7239
年,卷(期):2024.41(8)
  • 14