首页|关节镜联合肘管扩大成型术治疗肘关节骨性关节炎伴肘管综合征疗效观察

关节镜联合肘管扩大成型术治疗肘关节骨性关节炎伴肘管综合征疗效观察

Observation on the therapeutic effect of arthroscopy combined with cubital tunnel expansion and plasty in the treatment of elbow osteoarthritis with cubital tunnel syndrome

扫码查看
目的 探讨关节镜联合肘管扩大成型术治疗肘关节骨性关节炎伴肘管综合征的临床疗效.方法 选择2020年9月至2023年8月河北省沧州中西医结合医院骨外科收治的101例肘关节骨性关节炎伴肘管综合征患者为研究对象,按照手术方式不同将患者分为观察组(n=51)和对照组(n=50).观察组患者采用关节镜联合肘管扩大成型术,对照组患者采用常规肘管扩大成型术.观察并记录2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、并发症发生情况.分别于术前、术后6个月时,采用Mayo肘关节功能评分(MEPS)评估2组患者的肘关节功能,采用日常生活活动能力评定表(ADL)评估2组患者的日常生活能力,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估2组患者的疼痛程度;使用关节量角器测量肘关节旋前度数、旋后度数、屈伸度数,评估2组患者的肘关节活动度;使用Keypoint型肌电图仪检测小指展肌的复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)、尺神经的神经传导速度(NCV)、运动诱发电位潜伏期(MEPLP),评估2组患者神经恢复情况.结果 观察组患者的手术时间、住院时间显著短于对照组,术中出血量、并发症显著少于对照组(P<0.05).术前,观察组和对照组患者的MEPS、ADL、VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后6个月,观察组患者的MEPS、ADL评分显著高于对照组,VAS评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05).术前,观察组和对照组患者的旋前度数、旋后度数、屈伸度数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后6个月,2组患者的旋前度数、旋后度数、屈伸度数显著高于术前(P<0.05),观察组和对照组患者的旋前度数、旋后度数、屈伸度数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术前,观察组和对照组患者的CMAP、NCV、MEPLP比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后6个月,观察组患者的CMAP、NCV显著高于对照组,MEPLP显著低于对照组(P<0.05).结论 常规肘管扩大成型术、关节镜联合肘关节扩大成型术均可改善肘关节骨性关节炎伴肘管综合征患者的肘关节活动度,但后者损伤更小,恢复更快,在提升肘关节功能及日常生活能力、减轻疼痛程度、调节肌电图检查指标等方面效果更佳,且并发症更少.
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of arthroscopy combined with cubital tunnel expansion and plasty in the treatment of patients with elbow osteoarthritis and cubital tunnel syndrome.Methods A total of 101 patients with elbow osteoarthritis and cubital tunnel syndrome who were admitted to the Department of Orthopedics,Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated TCM-WM Hebei from September 2020 to August 2023 were selected as the research subjects.According to different surgical methods,the patients were divided into an observation group(n=51)and a control group(n=50).The surgical method in the observation group was arthroscopy combined with cubital tunnel expansion and plasty,and the surgical method in the control group was conventional cubital tunnel expansion and plasty.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,length of hospital stay,and complications were observed and recorded for both groups.The mayo elbow performance score(MEPS)was used to assess elbow function,the activities of daily living(ADL)scale was used to evaluate daily living ability,and the visual analogue scale(VAS)was used to assess pain levels preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively.Elbow range of motion,including pronation,supination,and flexion-extension,was measured using a goniometer.Nerve recovery was evaluated by measuring compound muscle action potential(CMAP)of the abductor digiti minimi,ulnar nerve conduction velocity(NCV),and motor evoked potential latency(MEPLP)using a Keypoint electromyography device.Results The operation time and length of hospital stay in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group,and the intraoperative blood loss and complications were significantly less than those in the control group(P<0.05).Before operation,there were no statistically significant differences in MEPS scores,ADL scores and VAS scores between the observation group and the control group(P>0.05);6 months after operation,the MEPS scores and ADL scores of patients in the observation group were signifi-cantly higher than those in the control group,and the VAS scores were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).Before operation,there were no statistically significant differences in pronation,supination and flexion-extension between the observation group and the control group(P>0.05);6 months after operation,the pronation,supination and flexion-extension of patients in the two groups were significantly higher than those before operation(P<0.05),but there were no statistically significant differences in pronation,supination and flexion-extension between the observation group and the control group(P>0.05).Before operation,there were no statistically significant differences in CMAP,NCV and MEPLP between the observation group and the control group(P>0.05);6 months after operation,the CMAP and NCV of patients in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group,and the MEPLP ratio was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Conventional cubital tunnel expansion and plasty and arthroscopy combined with cubital tunnel expansion and plasty can improve the range of motion of the elbow in patients with elbow osteoar-thritis and cubital tunnel syndrome,but the latter features less damage and faster recovery,is better in improving elbow function and daily living ability,reducing pain,and adjusting electromyographic examination indicators,and has fewer complications.

elbow osteoarthritis with cubital tunnel syndromearthroscopycubital tunnel expansion and plastyelbow joint function

李浩然、刘红正、姚泉丞、张玲、邢海洋、王兵

展开 >

河北省沧州中西医结合医院骨外科,河北 沧州 061001

肘关节骨性关节炎伴肘管综合征 关节镜 肘管扩大成型术 肘关节功能

沧州市重点研发计划自筹项目

20230309

2024

新乡医学院学报
新乡医学院

新乡医学院学报

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.999
ISSN:1004-7239
年,卷(期):2024.41(9)