首页|结核感染T细胞斑点试验、结核分枝杆菌核酸恒温扩增检测及腺苷脱氨酶联合检测在结核性胸腔积液诊断中的价值

结核感染T细胞斑点试验、结核分枝杆菌核酸恒温扩增检测及腺苷脱氨酶联合检测在结核性胸腔积液诊断中的价值

Value of tuberculosis infected T cells spot test,heated mycobacterium tuberculosis nucleic acid am-plification testing,and adenosine deaminase in combined diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion

扫码查看
目的 探讨结核感染T细胞斑点试验(T-SPOT.TB)、结核分枝杆菌核酸恒温扩增检测(TB-SAT)、腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)联合检测对结核性胸腔积液的诊断价值.方法 选择2021年1月至2021年12月于新乡医学院第一附属医院就诊的135例胸腔积液患者为研究对象,其中结核性胸腔积液患者83例,非结核性胸腔积液患者52例.135例患者均进行外周血T-SPOT.TB、胸腔积液TB-SAT和胸腔积液ADA检测,比较3种方法单独检测和联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的灵敏度及特异度.结果 T-SPOT.TB、TB-SAT、ADA单独检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的灵敏度、特异度比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的灵敏度显著高于T-SPOT.TB、TB-SAT、ADA 单独检测(x2=4.990、13.410、14.590,P<0.05);T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT 联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的特异度与T-SPOT.TB、TB-SAT、ADA单独检测比较差异均无统计学意义(x2=0.000、2.420、0.060,P>0.05).T-SPOT.TB+ADA联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的灵敏度显著高于ADA单独检测(x2=4.069,P<0.05),与T-SPOT.TB、TB-SAT单独检测比较差异无统计学意义(x2=0.055、3.384,P>0.05).T-SPOT.TB+ADA联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的特异度显著低于T-SPOT.TB、TB-SAT、ADA单独检测(x2=4.370、12.511、5.371,P<0.05).TB-SAT+ADA联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的灵敏度与T-SPOT.TB、TB-SAT、ADA单独检测比较差异均无统计学意义(x2=0.000、2.604、3.213,P>0.05).TB-SAT+ADA联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的特异度显著低于TB-SAT单独检测(x2=5.765,P<0.05),与T-SPOT.TB、ADA单独检测比较差异均无统计学意义(x2=0.782、1.251,P>0.05).T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT+ADA三者联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的灵敏度显著高于T-SPOT.TB、TB-SAT、ADA单独检测(x2=6.760、15.755、16.966,P<0.05);T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT+ADA三者联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的特异度显著低于 T-SPOT.TB、TB-SAT、ADA 单独检测(x2=4.370、12.511、5.371,P<0.05).T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT 联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的灵敏度显著高于T-SPOT.TB+ADA、TB-SAT+ADA联合检测(x2=4.090、4.990,P<0.05);T-SPOT.TB+ADA联合检测与TB-SAT+ADA联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的灵敏度比较差异无统计学意义(x2=0.060,P>0.05).T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的特异度显著高于T-SPOT.TB+ADA联合检测(x2=4.371,P<0.05);TB-SAT+ADA联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的特异度与T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT、T-SPOT.TB+ADA联合检测比较差异无统计学意义(x2=0.780、1.490,P>0.05).T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT+ADA三者联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的灵敏度与T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT联合检测比较差异无统计学意义(x2=0.210,P>0.05);T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT+ADA三者联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的灵敏度显著高于T-SPOT.TB+ADA、TB-SAT+ADA联合检测(x2=5.750、6.760,P<0.05).T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT+ADA三者联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的特异度显著低于T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT联合检测(x2=4.370,P<0.05);T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT+ADA三者联合检测诊断结核性胸腔积液的特异度与T-SPOT.TB+ADA、TB-SAT+ADA联合检测比较差异无统计学意义(x2=0.000、1.490,P>0.05).结论 联合检测较单一检测诊断结核性胸腔积液效果理想,外周血T-SPOT.TB联合胸腔积液TB-SAT诊断结核性胸腔积液的总体效能最好.联合检测能有效降低漏诊率和误诊率,对结核性胸腔积液具有较高的临床应用价值.
Objective To explore the value of tuberculosis infected T cells spot test(T-SPOT.TB),heated mycobacterium tuberculosis nucleic acid amplification testing(TB-SAT),and adenosine deaminase(ADA)in diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion.Methods A total of 135 patients with pleural effusion treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University from January 2021 to December 2021 were selected as the research subjects,including 83 patients with tuberculous pleural effusion and 52 patients with non-tuberculous pleural effusion.All these patients received peripheral blood T-SPOT.TB,chest water TB-SAT and chest water ADA tests,and the sensitivity and specificity of the above three methods in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion alone and in combination were compared.Results In terms of sensitivity and specificity,there was no statistically significant difference among the T-SPOT.TB,TB-SAT and ADA tests in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion alone(P>0.05).The sensitivity of the T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT combined test in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion was significantly higher than that of the T-SPOT.TB,TB-SAT and ADA tests alone(x2=4.990,13.410,14.590;P<0.05),while the specificity of the T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT combined test in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion showed no significant difference with that of the T-SPOT.TB,TB-SAT and ADA tests alone(x2=0.000,2.420,0.060;P>0.05).The sensitivity of the T-SPOT.TB+ADA combined test in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion was significantly higher than that of the ADA test alone(x2=4.069,P<0.05),but showed no significant difference with that of the T-SPOT.TB and TB-SAT tests alone(x2=0.055,3.384;P>0.05).The specificity of the T-SPOT.TB+ADA combined test in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion was significantly lower than that of the T-SPOT.TB,TB-SAT and ADA tests alone(x2=4.370,12.511,5.371;P<0.05).The sensitivity of the TB-SAT+ADA combined test in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion showed no significant difference with that of the T-SPOT.TB,TB-SAT and ADA tests alone(x2=0.000,2.604,3.213;P>0.05).The specificity of the TB-SAT+ADA combined test in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion was significantly lower than that of the TB-SAT test alone(x2=5.765,P<0.05),but showed no significant difference with that of the T-SPOT.TB and ADA tests alone(x2=0.782,1.251;P>0.05).The sensitivity of the T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT+ADA combined test in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion was significantly higher than that of the T-SPOT.TB,TB-SAT and ADA tests alone(x2=6.760,15.755,16.966;P<0.05),while the specificity of the T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT+ADA combined test in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion was significantly lower than that of the T-SPOT.TB,TB-SAT and ADA tests alone(x2=4.370,12.511,5.371;P<0.05).The sensitivity of the T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT combined test in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion was significantly higher than that of the T-SPOT.TB+ADA and TB-SAT+ADA combined tests(x2=4.090,4.990;P<0.05);there was no statistically significant difference in the sensitivity in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion between the T-SPOT.TB+ADA combined test and the TB-SAT+ADA combined test(x2=0.060,P>0.05).The specificity of the T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT combined test in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion was significantly higher than that of the T-SPOT.TB+ADA combined test(x2=4.371,P<0.05);the specificity of the TB-SAT+ADA combined test showed no significant difference with that of the T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT and T-SPOT.TB+ADA combined tests(x2=0.780,1.490;P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the sensitivity in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion between the T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT+ADA combined test and the T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT combined test(x2=0.210,P>0.05);the sensitivity of the T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT+ADA combined test in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion was significantly higher than that of the T-SPOT.TB+ADA and TB-SAT+ADA combined tests(x2=5.750,6.760;P<0.05).The specificity of the T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT+ADA combined test in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion was significantly lower than that of the T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT combined test(x2=4.370,P<0.05);the specificity of the T-SPOT.TB+TB-SAT+ADA combined test in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion showed no significant difference with that of the T-SPOT.TB+ADA and TB-SAT+ADA combined tests(x2=0.000,1.490;P>0.05).Conclusion The combined detection performs better than the single detection in diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion,and the peripheral blood T-SPOT.TB combined with chest water TB-SAT performs the best in detecting tuberculous pleural effusion.The combined detection can effectively reduce the missed diagnosis rate and the misdiagnosis rate,and has high clinical application value for diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion.

tuberculosistuberculous pleural effusiontuberculosis infected T cells spot testheated mycobacterium tu-berculosis nucleic acid amplification testingadenosine deaminase

郑歌、韩冉、寿好长、郑献民、马子坤

展开 >

北京中医药大学东方医院检验科,北京 100078

新乡医学院第一附属医院结核内科,河南 卫辉 453100

结核病 结核性胸腔积液 结核感染T细胞斑点试验 结核分枝杆菌核酸恒温扩增检测技术 腺苷脱氨酶

2024

新乡医学院学报
新乡医学院

新乡医学院学报

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.999
ISSN:1004-7239
年,卷(期):2024.41(10)
  • 6