首页|论行政诉讼原告诉讼请求对法院的拘束力

论行政诉讼原告诉讼请求对法院的拘束力

扫码查看
诉讼请求是原告权利主张的核心体现,决定着法院审理案件争议的内容和边界,但只有原告的诉讼请求足够具体时,才对法院具有拘束力。实践中,当涉及诉讼请求所确定的诉讼标的、原告撤诉后再次以相同的诉讼请求提起诉讼等情形时,诉讼请求对法院具有强拘束力。由于受到基于行政诉讼监督行政机关依法行政的功能而确立的合法性审查原则的限制,以及受到法官运用利益衡量原则、重大情势变更原则和尊让行政裁量权的影响,诉判往往不能一一对应,法院不得不超出原告的诉讼请求进行裁判,以同时满足保护原告合法权益和保护公共利益的需要,因而此时原告的具体诉讼请求仅对法院具有"牵引"作用,即相对拘束力。
On the Binding Effect of Plaintiff's Claims for Court
Claims show plaintiff's core interests,and also determine the content and domain of a court's jurisdiction. However,plaintiff's claims can be binding only if it is concrete enough. In judicial practice,concrete claims will achieve absolute binding effect in terms of repeated prosecution and object of action. Nevertheless,it is not uncommon that the judge can sometime"ignore"the principle of "No Trial without Complaint". As a result,the verdict is not in consist with plaintiff's claims. Because administrative proceedings have the responsibility to supervise the governmental organizations carry out administrative management lawfully. What's more,due to the necessity of protecting public interests and changing of the facts,a judge has to hear the case beyond plaintiff's concrete claims. That's to say, disposition principle can only be applied with restrictions. In this sense,concrete claims only possess relative binding effect to court except some special circumstances.

ClaimsAdministrative proceedingsBinding effectRelative binding

张松波

展开 >

东南大学法治政府研究中心, 江苏 南京 210000

原告诉讼请求 行政诉讼 拘束力 相对

2019

行政法学研究
中国政法大学

行政法学研究

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.827
ISSN:1005-0078
年,卷(期):2019.(1)
  • 9
  • 29