首页|个人自治法益观下"不作为诈骗"的保证人地位分析

个人自治法益观下"不作为诈骗"的保证人地位分析

扫码查看
从只考虑法益客观侧面的传统观点来分析不作为诈骗并不全面,需要转向个人自治的法益观,考虑诈骗罪法益的主观"自治"侧面."自治"的范围要分别受到社会效率与安全、主体相互间自由价值辩证统一的约束.为满足不作为与作为等价性评价与区分民刑诈骗的要求,可以采取危险来源控制说的立场,将内容限于能对受骗人造成损失且难以救济作为基础事实判断.
Analysis of the Guarantor Status of"Non-Act Fraud"Under the Perspective of Personal Autonomy Legal Interests
The analysis of non-act fraud,grounded solely in the traditional framework that exclusively considers the objective di-mension of legal interests,lacks comprehensiveness.A paradigm shift toward an individual-autonomy-oriented legal-interest per-spective is imperative.This transition involves a nuanced examination of the subjective facet of"autonomy"within the context of fraudulent activities.The delineation of the scope of"autonomy"should be subject to meticulous constraints associated with so-cial efficiency,security considerations,and the dialectical synthesis of freedom values interwoven among individuals.In order to fulfill the prerequisites for equivalency assessment and the demarcation between civil and criminal fraud,it is plausible to adopt the standpoint advocated by the theory of controlling the source of danger.This perspective confines the guarantor status in cases of non-genuine non-act fraud to judicious assessments founded on the potential harm inflicted upon the deceived party and the in-herent challenges associated with providing redress.

fraudlegal interestnon-act crimeguarantor statusobjective imputation

朱家鑫

展开 >

清华大学 法学院,北京 100084

诈骗罪 法益 不作为犯 保证人地位 客观归责

2024

盐城工学院学报(社会科学版)
盐城工学院

盐城工学院学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.172
ISSN:1008-5092
年,卷(期):2024.37(3)
  • 11