首页|2019-2020年成都市中小学生正向发展现状及家庭和社会影响因素的比较研究

2019-2020年成都市中小学生正向发展现状及家庭和社会影响因素的比较研究

扫码查看
目的 了解中小学生正向发展现状及影响因素,为促进中小学生正向发展提供可参考的意见和建议.方法 采用整群随机抽样法,于2019年12月至2020年1月对成都市内5所中小学的学生及其家长采用中国家庭评估工具和华人青少年正向发展量表调查中小学生的家庭功能障碍程度和正向发展水平,使用SPSS 24.0软件进行单因素分析和多元线性回归分析,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义.结果 共纳入4522名3~6年级小学生和3 144名初中生及其家长.小学生正向发展得分(450.139±53.876)分、中学生得分(430.722±65.167)分,中小学生得分差异有统计学意义(F=142.803,P<0.001).多元线性回归分析结果显示,小学阶段的家庭功能障碍程度低(β=-0.396)、孩子自感与照顾者关系好(p=0.214)以及照顾者自感与孩子的关系好(β=0.074)的得分更高,女性的得分比男性更高(β=-0.044),6年级的得分较3、4、5年级更高(β值依次为-0.088、-0.068、-0.046),父亲学历为大学或以上的得分较小学及以下的更高(β=-0.036),家庭月收入≥10000元的得分较家庭月收入<3 000元的更高(β=0.041),父亲生育年龄在24~29岁的得分较30~34岁的更高(β=-0.032)(P均<0.05);初中阶段的家庭功能障碍程度低(β=-0.341)、孩子自感与照顾者关系好(β=0.197)以及照顾者自感与孩子的关系更好(β=0.104)的得分高,居住地在城镇的得分较农村更高(β=0.043),7年级的得分较9年级更高(β=0.091),父亲学历为大学或以上的得分比初中或小学及以下的更高(β值依次为-0.072、-0.075,P均<0.05).结论 初中生正向发展水平低于小学生,且小学和初中阶段的正向发展影响因素也有不同,家庭功能障碍程度和亲子关系对不同教育阶段的中小学生正向发展水平影响均最为显著.在进行教育课程规划时,教育工作者和相关专业人员可对家庭功能障碍程度高、亲子关系较差、父亲学历较低的中小学生,处于初中阶段的尤其是高年级或居住在农村的初中生,处于小学阶段的性别为男、年级较低、家庭月收入较低的学生加强关注和帮助,通过了解学生的个体和家庭特征制定有针对性的干预措施来促进学生正向发展.
Current status and family and social influencing factors of positive development of elementary and middle school students in Chengdu,China from 2019 to 2020
Objective To understand the current status and influencing factors of positive development in elementary and middle school students,and provide reference strategies and suggestions to promote their positive development.Methods This study employed a cluster random sampling method.From December 2019 to January 2020,a total of 7 666 elementary in grades 3 to 6 and middle school students and their parents from five schools in Chengdu were selected.A self-designed general information questionnaire was used to collect demographic data and relationship closeness information of students and parents.The Chinese Family Assessment Instrument(C-FAI)and the Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale(CPYDS)were used to assess the level of family dysfunction and positive development in students.Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to identify the influencing factors of positive development in elementary and middle school students.Results This study included 4 522 elementary school students and 3 144 middle school students and their parents.The positive development scores of elementary school students and middle school students were 450.139±53.876 and 430.722±65.167,respectively,with statistically significant differences(F=142.803,P<0.001).Multiple linear regression analysis showed that low family dysfunction(β=-0.396),high child's perceived relationship with caregivers(β=0.214),and high caregiver's perceived relationship with the child(β=0.074),and women(β=-0.044)were related to higher scores of positive development in elementary students.The scores of positive development in 6th graders were higher than those of 3rd,4th and 5th graders(β values were-0.088,-0.068 and-0.046,respectively).Students with father having a university degree or higher scored higher than those with father having a primary school degree or lower(β=-0.036).Individuals with a monthly family income of ≥10 000 yuan had a higher score than those with a monthly family income of less than 3 000 yuan(β=0.041),and those whose fathers with a childbearing age of 24-29 years had higher scores than those aged 30-34 years(β=-0.032)(P<0.05 for all).Low family dysfunction(β=-0.341),the children felt that they had a better relationship with their caregivers(β=0.197),and the caregivers'self-perceived a better relationship with their children(β=0.104),lived in urban areas(β=0.043)and grade 7(β=0.091)had higher scores of positive development in middle school students.Students with father's education level of university degree or above had higher scores than those who were in middle school or elementary school or below(β values were-0.072,-0.075,P<0.05 for all).Conclusions The positive development level of the middle school students was lower than that of the elementary school students,and the influencing factors of positive development in primary and junior high school education were different.Family dysfunction and parent-child relationship had the most significant impact on the positive development level of the elementary and middle school students.When planning educational courses,educators and related professionals can target middle students with high levels of family dysfunction,poor parent-child relationships,and low-educated fathers,especially those in senior grades or who live in rural areas.Boys,students in lower grades,and students with lower family monthly income in elementary school,need to receive more attention and help.Targeted intervention measures should be developed by understanding the students'individual and family characteristics to promote students'positive development.

Positive youth developmentFamily functioningElementary and middle school studentsSurvey researchRegression analysis

佟云萱、王燕、李源、廖书娟、赵莉、蒋莉华、罗碧如

展开 >

四川大学华西第二医院护理部/四川大学华西护理学院,成都 610041

四川大学华西第二医院出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室,成都 610041

四川大学华西第二医院生殖医学科,成都 610041

四川大学华西公共卫生学院,成都 610041

四川大学华西临床医学院/华西医院全科医学中心/全科医学教研室,成都 610041

展开 >

青少年正向发展 家庭功能 中小学生 调查研究 回归分析

青少年正面成长纵向研究项目

19H0642

2024

预防医学情报杂志
中华预防医学会,四川省疾病预防控制中心

预防医学情报杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.681
ISSN:1006-4028
年,卷(期):2024.40(3)
  • 31