首页|不同消毒方法对环境表面的持续性杀菌性能及成本比较

不同消毒方法对环境表面的持续性杀菌性能及成本比较

扫码查看
目的 比较4种消毒方法对环境表面的持续杀菌性能及成本,为临床环境消毒剂和消毒频次的选择提供实验依据.方法 选用耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)为试验菌株,以不锈钢板模拟医院环境表面,用75%乙醇湿巾、季铵盐医用卫生湿巾、500 mg/L含氯消毒剂浸润抹布、1 000 mg/L含氯消毒剂浸润抹布按照标准擦拭方法对不锈钢板进行擦拭消毒,分别在消毒前、消毒后即刻及30、60、90、120、150、240 min滴加试验菌悬液,作用5 min后采样并培养.比较4种消毒方法在不同时间的菌落总数和细菌杀灭率,统计消毒成本.结果 与消毒前比较,4种消毒剂在消毒后各时间点的菌落数均降低(P<0.01);乙醇湿巾消毒后90 min开始检出细菌菌落,与消毒后即刻比较差异有统计学意义(t=-3.6,P=0.02),消毒后150、180、240 min细菌菌落数逐渐增多,与消毒后120 min比较差异有统计学意义(t值分别为-13.2、-4.2、-8.2,P<0.01);双链季铵盐、500 mg/L含氯消毒剂均在消毒后120 min检出细菌菌落(t值分别为-3.5、-4.4,P<0.01),消毒后150、180、240 min细菌菌落数逐渐增多,与消毒后120 min比较差异有统计学意义(双链季铵盐组 t 值分别为-2.7、-7.9、-9.5,P<0.01;500 mg/L 含氯消毒剂组 t 值分别为-3.2、-8.4、-9.8,P<0.01);1 000 mg/L含氯消毒剂在消毒后150 min开始检出细菌菌落(t=-2.0,P=0.01),180、240 min细菌菌落数逐渐增多,与消毒后150 min比较差异有统计学意义(t分别为-2.0、-9.4,P<0.01).消毒后即刻及30、60、240 min,4种消毒方法对环境表面细菌的杀菌率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);乙醇湿巾消毒后90 min杀菌率降为95.1%,其他3种消毒方法杀菌率仍为100.0%(x2=11.4,P=0.01);消毒后120 min,1 000 mg/L含氯消毒剂杀菌率仍为100.0%,其他3种消毒方法杀菌率均下降(x2=9.4,P=0.02);消毒后150 min,乙醇湿巾、500 mg/L含氯消毒剂杀菌率降至90.0%以下(x2=8.3,P=0.04);消毒后180 min,乙醇湿巾、双链季铵盐湿巾、500 mg/L含氯消毒剂杀菌率均明显下降,1 000 mg/L含氯消毒剂杀菌率仍为98.5%(x2=9.4,P=0.03);消毒后240 min,4种消毒剂杀菌率均下降,差异无统计学意义(x2=4.0,P=0.26).4种消毒方法每次消毒总成本比较差异无统计学意义(F=0.4,P=0.68).结论 4种消毒方法均对环境表面具有良好的杀菌效果,但从杀菌持续性、稳定性、腐蚀性等方面考虑,一次性双链季铵盐消毒湿巾具有较高的性价比.建议对经常接触的医疗设备或易被污染的环境表面应加强消毒力度.
Comparison on continuous disinfection ability and cost of different disinfection methods on environmental surfaces
Objective To compare the continuous disinfection ability and cost of 4 disinfection methods on the surface,so as to provide an experimental basis for selecting disinfectants and determining disinfection frequencies in clinical environ-ments.Methods Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA)was selected as the tester strain,and stainless steel plates were used to simulate the surface of a hospital object.The 75%alcohol wipes,double-chain quaternary ammo-nium salt medical sanitary wipes,500 mg/L chlorine disinfectant infiltration wipes,1 000 mg/L chlorine disinfectant infil-tration wipes were used to wipe and disinfect the stainless steel plate according to the standard wiping method.The test bacterial suspension was applied before disinfection and at various time points after disinfection(0 min,30 min,60 min,90 min,120 min,150 min,240 min),with sampling and culturing performed after 5 minutes of exposure.The total number of bacterial colonies and bacterial killing rate on the environmental surface of the 4 disinfection methods in different time periods was compared,and calculated the cost of four disinfectants.Results Compared with the pre-disinfection period,all 4 disinfectants showed a decrease in the number of colonies at all time points after disinfection(P<0.01).Bacterial colonies began to be detected 90 min after disinfection using ethanol wipes,and the difference was statistically significant when compared with the immediate post-disinfection period(t was-3.6,P=0.02),and the number of bacterial colonies increased gradually at 150,180,and 240 min post-disinfection,and the difference was statistically significant when compared with 120 min post-disinfection(t was-13.2,-4.2,-8.2,P<0.01);Bacterial colonies were detected at 120 min after disinfection for both double-chain quaternary ammonium salt and 500 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant(t was-3.5,-4.4,P<0.01),and the number of bacterial colonies gradually in-creased at 150,180,and 240 min after disinfection,and the difference was statistically significant when compared with that at 120 min after disinfection(double-chain quaternary ammonium salt group:t was-2.7,-7.9,-9.5,P<0.01;500 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant group:t was-3.2,-8.4,-9.8,P<0.01).Bacterial colonies started to be detected in 1 000 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant at 150 min after disinfection(t=-2.0,P=0.01),and the number of bacterial col-onies gradually increased at 180 and 240 min,and the difference was statistically significant when compared with that at 150 min after disinfection(t was-2.0,-9.4,P<0.01).Immediately after disinfection and at 30,60,and 240 minutes,there was no statistically significant difference in disinfection rates among the four methods(P>0.05).However,at 90 minutes,the disinfection rate of the ethanol wipes decreased significantly to 95.1%,while the other three methods main-tained 100.0%disinfection(xz=11.4,P=0.01).At 120 min after disinfection,the disinfection rate of 1 000 mg/L chlorine disinfectant group was still 100.0%,and the disinfection rate of the other 3 disinfection methods decreased(x2=9.4,P=0.02).At 150 min after disinfection,the disinfection rate of ethanol disinfectant group remained 100.0%,and the disinfection rate of other 3 disinfection methods decreased(x2=9.4,P=0.02);1 000 mg/L chlorine disinfectant group remained 100.0%for 150 min after disinfection.The disinfection rate of ethanol disinfectant group remained 100.0%for 150 min after disinfection.The disinfection rate of 1 000 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant group was still 100.0%,and the disinfection rate of the other 3 disinfection methods decreased(x2=9.4,P=0.02).At 150 min after disinfection,the disinfection rate of ethanol wet wipes group and 500 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant group de-creased to less than 90.0%(x2=8.3,P=0.04).At 180 min after disinfection,the disinfection rate of ethanol wet wipes group,double-chained quaternary ammonium wipes group,500 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant group all decreased significantly,and the disinfection rate of 1 000 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant group was still 98.5%(x2=9.4,P=0.03).At 240 min after disinfection,the disinfection rate of all 4 disinfectants decreased,and the difference was not statistically significant(x2=4.0,P=0.26).There was no statistically significant difference in the total cost of each dis-infection among the 4 disinfection methods(F=0.4,P=0.68).Conclusion All the 4 disinfection methods have good bactericidal effect on the surface of environmental objects,but considering the bactericidal continuity,stability,corrosion and other aspects,disposable double-chain quaternary ammonium salt disinfection wipes have a high cost-effectiveness.It is recommended that disinfection of frequently touched medical equipment or easily contaminated environmental surfaces be intensified.

Staphylococcus aureusDisinfection75%ethanolDouble chain quaternary ammonium saltDisinfectantEnvi-ronmental surface

邹朝双、高莹、罗炜、高园、郭明孝、王海涛

展开 >

德州市疾病预防控制中心职业与环境卫生监测科,山东 253016

德州市人民医院招标办公室

德州市妇幼保健院医院感染管理科

金黄色葡萄球菌 消毒 75%乙醇 双链季铵盐 消毒剂 环境表面

山东省德州市妇幼保健协会科技创新计划项目

DFY-202216

2024

预防医学论坛
中华预防医学会

预防医学论坛

影响因子:0.645
ISSN:1672-9153
年,卷(期):2024.30(7)