首页|血清CST1、JAM2在非小细胞肺癌中的表达及其诊断、预后价值

血清CST1、JAM2在非小细胞肺癌中的表达及其诊断、预后价值

The expression of serum CST1 and JAM2 in non-small cell lung cancer and their diagnostic and prognostic value

扫码查看
目的 探讨非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者血清半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂1(CST1)、连接黏附分子2(JAM2)的表达及其对NSCLC诊断及预后评估的价值.方法 选取2019年2月-2021年2月中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二六医院肿瘤科收治的NSCLC患者112例作为NSCLC组,以肺良性疾病患者60例为非NSCLC组,医院同期健康体检者60例作为健康对照组.采用ELISA法检测血清CST1、JAM2水平;Kaplan-Meier曲线比较不同CST1、JAM2表达水平NSCLC患者的预后差异;Cox回归分析NSCLC患者生存预后的独立危险因素;受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析血清CST1、JAM2对NSCLC的诊断价值.结果 与非NSCLC组和健康对照组比较,NSCLC组患者血清CST1水平较高,而血清JAM2水平较低,差异均有统计学意义(F/P=1 154.772/<0.001,354.830/<0.001);与TNM分期Ⅰ~Ⅱ期、无淋巴结转移患者比较,TNM分期Ⅲ期、淋巴结转移患者血清CST1较高、血清JAM2较低,差异均有统计学意义(t/P=8.842/<0.001,10.070/<0.001,18.243/<0.001,23.365/<0.001);CST1 高表达亚组及低表达亚组3年总生存率分别为50.00%(30/60)、71.15%(37/52),2亚组比较差异有统计学意义(Log Rank x2=5.897,P=0.015);JAM2高表达亚组及低表达亚组3年生存率分别为72.73%(40/55)、47.37%(27/57),2亚组比较差异有统计学意义(Log Rank x2=7.299,P=0.007).肿瘤分期Ⅲ期、淋巴结转移、血清CST1高是NSCLC患者不良预后的危险因素,JAM2 高是保护因素[HR(95%CI)=1.610(1.007~2.505),2.263(1.151~6.100),2.522(1.406~4.563),0.557(0.368~0.844)];血清 CST1、JAM2 及二者联合预测 NSCLC 预后的 AUC 分别为 0.816、0.862、0.924,二者联合大于血清CST1、JAM2各自单项的AUC(Z=5.123、4.012,P均<0.001).结论 NSCLC患者血清CST1升高,JAM2降低,与不良临床病理参数有关,两者联合对NSCLC的预后具有较高的诊断价值,是评估NSCLC患者预后的血清标志物.
Objective To investigate the expression of serum Cystatin SN(CST1)and junctional adhesion molecule 2(JAM2)in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)patients and their diagnostic and prognostic value in NSCLC.Methods One hundred and twelve NSCLC patients admitted to the Oncology Department of the 926th Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistics Support Force from February 2019 to February 2021 were selected as the NSCLC group,60 patients with benign lung diseases were selected as the non NSCLC group,and 60 healthy individuals who underwent physical examinations at the same time in the hospital were selected as the healthy control group.ELISA was used to meas-ure serum CST1JAM2 level.Kaplan-Meier curve was used to compare the prognosis of NSCLC patients with different CST1 and JAM2 expression levels.COX regression was used to analyze the independent risk factors for survival and prognosis of NSCLC patients.The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the diagnostic value of serum CST1 and JAM2 for NSCLC.Results Compared with the non-NSCLC group and the healthy control group,the serum CST1 level in the NSCLC group was higher,while the serum JAM2 level was lower,and the differences were statistically significant(t/P=57.041/<0.001,54.550/<0.001;31.641/<0.001,30203/<0.001);NSCLC patients with TNM stage Ⅲ and lymph node metas-tasis had higher serum CST1 level and lower serum JAM2 level,and the differences were statistically significant(t/P=8.842/<0.001,10.070/<0.001,18243/<0.001,23.365/<0.001);The 3-year overall survival rates of CST1 high expression sub-group and low expression subgroup were 50.00%(30/60)and 71.15%(37/52),respectively,and the difference between the 2 subgroups was statistically significant(Log Rank x2=5.897,P=0.015);The 3-year survival rates of JAM2 high expression subgroup and low expression subgroup were 72.73%(40/55)and 47.37%(27/57),respectively,the difference between the 2 subgroups was statistically significant(Log Rank x2=7299,P=0.007).Tumor stage Ⅲ,lymph node metastasis and high se-rum CST1 were risk factors for poor prognosis of NSCLC patients,while high serum JAM2 was a protective factor[HR(95%CI)=1.610(1.007-2.505),2263(1.151-6.100),2.522(1.406-4.563),0.557(0.368-0.844)];The AUC of serum CST1,JAM2 and their combination in predicting the prognosis of NSCLC were 0.816,0.862 and 0.924,respectively.The AUC of the combination of the two was greater than that of serum CST1 or JAM2 alone(Z=5.123,4.012,all P<0.001).Conclusion The increase of serum CST1 and decrease of JAM2 in NSCLC patients are related to adverse clinical and pathological pa-rameters.The combination of the two has high diagnostic value for the prognosis of NSCLC and is a serum biomarker for evaluating the prognosis of NSCLC patients.

Non-small cell lung cancerCysteine protease inhibitor 1Connect adhesive molecule 2DiagnosisPrognosis

梁凯、孟铖、张世荣、蒋丹萍、杨宝升、石云

展开 >

661699 云南开远,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二六医院检验输血科

661699 云南开远,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二六医院肿瘤科

661699 云南开远,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二六医院心外呼吸科

非小细胞肺癌 半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂1 连接黏附分子2 诊断 预后

云南省基础研究计划项目

202001AU070058

2024

疑难病杂志
中国医师协会

疑难病杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.171
ISSN:1671-6450
年,卷(期):2024.23(7)