首页|文义的边界与文义解释的限度——《民法典》语境下的方法论展开

文义的边界与文义解释的限度——《民法典》语境下的方法论展开

扫码查看
文字作为信息的传递途径和内容,是认知的起点.法律文本依附于文字,法律规范的意义同样以文字的意义(即文义)为基础.法律适用的过程,即法律解释的过程,始于文义,一定程度上也止于文义.文义有边界,超出文字意义的限度,即超出了法律解释的范围,进入法的续造领域,须借助类推等方式进行法律漏洞填补.文义解释是法律解释的起点,但不是全部,有其限度;即便是文义清晰时,亦应将自罗马法以来的"明白无误规则"仅认定为一项推定规则,仍需结合其他解释方法,尤其是目的解释,来探求规范的"目的"和"意义".《民法典》解释适用语境下,以解释论为面向,应坚持文义解释的方法论价值,亦应在此基础上超越其"文本"价值本身.
The Boundary of Literary Meaning and the Limit of Literary Meaning Interpretation:Methodological Discourse in the Context of the Civil Code
Text,serving as both the medium and content of information,forms the foundation of cognition.Legal texts are attached to words,and the meaning of legal norms is also based on the meaning of words(literary meanings).The process of law application,namely,the process of legal interpretation,starts and largely concludes with the literary meaning of the text.Literary meaning is bounded,exceeding literal limits extends beyond the realm of legal interpretation.It enters the domain of ongoing legal creation,requiring the filling of loopholes through analogies and other methods.Literary interpretation is the starting point of legal interpretation,yet it has its limits and is not exhaustive.Even when the textual meaning is clear,the"clear and unmistakable rule"since Roman law should be recognized as only a presumptive rule.It is still necessary to combine other interpretation methods,especially purposive interpretation,to explore the"purpose"and"meaning"of the norm.In applying the interpretation of the Civil Code,aligning with interpretation theory,it is imperative to uphold the methodological value of literal interpretation and also essential to transcend the mere"textual"value inherent in literal interpretation.

Literal InterpretationLiterary MeaningCivil CodeInterpretation of LawDevelopment of Law

毕经纬

展开 >

澳门科技大学法学院

文义解释 文义 《民法典》 法律解释 法的续造

2024

云南社会科学
云南省社会科学院

云南社会科学

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.532
ISSN:1000-8691
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 6