首页|指导性案例制度的运行思路再定位

指导性案例制度的运行思路再定位

扫码查看
指导性案例制度旨在通过各级法院参照适用前案的方式,推进法律适用的统一.但该制度的运行存在效力不明确、供给量不足、适用范围不广等诸多问题.鉴于遵循先例以实现同案同判的运行机制与指导性案例以确保法律适用统一的运行机制具有相似性,通过分析判例法上遵循先例的运行条件,融入指导性案例的运行环境观察其运行效果,发现由于两者的法律适用逻辑存在根本性差异,指导性案例制度实现法律适用统一的效率性、稳定性、权威性和发展性等方面皆不尽如人意.指导性案例应当回归其指导示范价值而非硬性拘束,并围绕覆盖司法分歧和增加案例竞争,完善相应的遴选与退出机制.
Re-orientation of the Operational Route of the Guiding Case System
The guiding case system aims to promote the unity of legal application through the reference to previous cases by all courts at all levels.However,the operation of the system is plagued by numerous issues such as unclear effectiveness,inadequate supply,and limited application scope.Given the similarities between the operating mechanism of following precedents to achieve consistent judgment and guiding cases to ensure the uniformity of application of law.By analyzing the operating conditions of following precedents in case law and observing its effects within the operating environment of guiding cases,it is found that there are fundamental differences in the logic of legal application between the two methods.therefore,efficiency,stability,authority,and development of the guiding case system in achieving unified application of law are not satisfactory.Guiding cases should return to their value as guiding demonstrations rather than binding force,and should focus on covering judicial disputes and increasing case competition while improving corresponding selection and withdrawal mechanisms.

Guiding CaseStare DecisisSame Case Same JudgmentUnified Legal ApplicationOperational Mechanism

毕潇潇

展开 >

烟台大学法学院

烟台大学民事实体法与程序法交叉研究院

指导性案例 遵循先例 同案同判 法律适用统一 运行机制

国家社会科学基金

21BFX091

2024

云南社会科学
云南省社会科学院

云南社会科学

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.532
ISSN:1000-8691
年,卷(期):2024.(2)
  • 46