首页|数字治理中的技治主义:困境、根源与突破

数字治理中的技治主义:困境、根源与突破

扫码查看
数字治理正成为数字时代全球治理的崭新范式,在推进国家治理现代化进程中既展示出极大的赋能增效作用,也日益暴露出数字控制、权力剥夺、价值偏好等消极影响,暗藏颇为危险的技治主义倾向。数字治理中的技治主义困境表现为"重技术应用轻治理实践""重工具理性轻价值理性""重机器判断轻人类决策"的技治主义行为导向、霸权逻辑和系统风险,其生成根源在于执持技术决定论的技术社会观、追求绩效主义的社会进步观、迷信机器决策的智能治理观和数字治理缺乏反思性再治理。为有效规制算法运行、推进数字民主、迈向数字善治,必须重构数字技术理性,优化数字治理生态,构建负责任和可问责的算法运行,限定数字治理的合理界限,发展积极的数字治理,加强伦理规制和系统性再治理。
Technocracy in Digital Governance:Dilemmas,Roots and Breakthroughs
Digital governance is becoming a new paradigm for global governance in the digital age. While it demonstrates great empowerment and efficiency in advancing the modernization of national governance,it also increasingly reveals negative impact of digital control,deprivation of rights,and value preferences,indicating a potentially dangerous tendency towards technocracy. The technocratic dilemma in digital governance is characterized by a technocratic orientation,hegemonic logic and systematic risks. These are evident in tendencies such as "emphasizing technology application over governance practice","prioritizing instrumental rationality over value rationality","favoring machine judgment over human decision-making". These issues stem from a technology-determinant view of society,a progress-oriented view driven by performance,a reliance on machine decision-making,and a lack of reflective re-governance within digital governance. To effectively regulate algorithmic operations,promote digital democracy and move towards good digital governance,it is necessary to reconstruct the rationality of digital technology,optimize the ecology of digital governance,and construct responsible and accountable algorithms,define the reasonable boundaries of digital governance,foster positive digital governance,strengthen ethical regulation and systematic re-governance.

Digital GovernanceTechnocracyIntelligent GovernanceGood Digital Governance

邬晓燕

展开 >

北京交通大学马克思主义学院

数字治理 技治主义 智慧治理 数字善治

2024

云南社会科学
云南省社会科学院

云南社会科学

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.532
ISSN:1000-8691
年,卷(期):2024.(6)