首页|老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折三种手术策略比较

老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折三种手术策略比较

扫码查看
目的 对比老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折三种手术策略的安全性和有效性.方法 连续入选2020年8月-2023年5月收住曲靖市第一人民医院的81例老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折患者(男32例、女49例,年龄最小66岁、最大103岁、平均(79±11.6)岁,分为AFHR、PFLP、PFNA.观察术中出血量、术后负重时间、手术时间、并发症等,术后12个月评估患者的髋关节Harris功能优良率.结果 PFNA组术中出血少于PFLP组和AFHR组(120.39±49.76)mL VS(243.53±102.22)mL VS(194.62±65.62)mL,P<0.01).三组手术耗时无差异(78.07±7.26)min VS(86.59±9.55)min VS(82.66±13.38)min,P>0.05)o AFHR 组术后下床时间明显短于 PFNA 组和 PFLP 组(1.88±0.65)d VS(4.03±0.78)d VS(6.00±1.00)d,P<0.01).AFHR 组术后负重时间明显短于 PFNA 组和 PFLP 组(0.40±0.13)W VS(7.26±2.15)W VS(10.24±1.72)W,P<0.01).随访12个月的髋关节功能优良率,AFHR和PFNA组优于PFLP组(84.6%VS 84.2%VS 76.5%,P<0.05),AFHR组与PFNA组无差异(84.6%VS 84.2%,P>0.05).结论 AFHR、PFNA和PFLP三种手术策略均属老年不稳定转子间骨折的有效疗法.AFHR策略手术耗时短、术后下床早、术后功能恢复满意,显著提高患者生活质量.
Comparison of three surgical strategies for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly
Objective To compare the safety and effectiveness of three surgical strategies for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly.Methods A total of 81 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture admitted to the First People's Hospital of Qujing City from August 2020 to May 2023(32 males and 49 females,with the minimun age of 66 years and the maximum age of 103 years,with an average age of 79±11.6 years)were continuously selected and divided into artificial femoral head replacement group(AFHR),proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail fixation group(PFNA)and proximal femoral locking plate fixation group(PFLP).Intraoperative blood loss,postoperative weight-bearing time,operative time and complications were observed.The good rate of Harris hip function score was evaluated 12 months after surgery.Results The intraoperative bleeding in PFNA group was less than that in PFLP group and AFHR group(120.39±49.76mL VS 243.53±102.22mL VS 194.62±65.62mL,P<0.01).There was no difference in operation time among the three groups(78.07±7.26min VS 86.59±9.55min VS 82.66±13.38min,all P>0.05).The time to get out of bed in AFHR group was significantly shorter than that in PFNA group and PFLP group(1.88±0.65d VS 4.03±0.78d VS 6.00± 1.00d,P<0.01).The weight bearing time of AFHR group was significantly shorter than that in PFNA group and PFLP group(0.40± 0.13W VS 7.26±2.15W VS 10.24±1.72W,P<0.01).At 12 months follow-up,the good rate of hip function of AFHR and PFNA groups was better than that of PFLP group(84.6%VS 84.2%VS 76.5%,P<0.05),there was no difference between AFHR and PFNA groups(84.6%VS 84.2%,P>0.05).Conclusions AFHR,PFNA and PFLP are effective strategies for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly.AFHR strategy has the advantages of short operation time,early getting out of bed and satisfactory functional recovery,which significantly improves patients'quality of life.

intertrochanteric femoral fractureelderlyjoint replacementoperation mode

李阳杰、王叶武、朱博、贺天磊、李智

展开 >

曲靖市第一人民医院关节与运动医学科,云南 曲靖 655000

股骨转子间骨折 老年 关节置换 手术方式

云南省科技厅昆医联合专项曲靖市第一人民医院科研课题

202201AY070001-2182021YJKTF05

2024

云南医药
中华医学会云南分会

云南医药

影响因子:0.459
ISSN:1006-4141
年,卷(期):2024.45(1)
  • 15