燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版)2024,Vol.25Issue(5) :21-25.DOI:10.15883/j.13-1277/c.20240502105

论新因明三支论式的四种有效式

On the Four Valid Formulas of Three Part Syllogism of New-Hetuvidya

侯玉娟 张忠义
燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版)2024,Vol.25Issue(5) :21-25.DOI:10.15883/j.13-1277/c.20240502105

论新因明三支论式的四种有效式

On the Four Valid Formulas of Three Part Syllogism of New-Hetuvidya

侯玉娟 1张忠义2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 湖北工程学院 马克思主义学院,湖北 孝感 432000
  • 2. 燕山大学 文法学院,河北 秦皇岛 066004
  • 折叠

摘要

新因明三支论式逻辑性质的研究是因明研究中的核心问题之一.目前的论争,代表性观点有两类四种:三支论式与三段论完全不同、三支论式与三段论的AAA式相当;三支论式可以转化成三段论的AAA式;三支论式本质上是充分条件假言推理.以上观点都犯了以偏概全的错误.新因明的三支论式虽没有明确的类型分类,却情形各异,必须具体论式具体分析.新因明三支论式从形式逻辑角度来看可以存在外设三段论、形式蕴涵否定式、全称量词消去后的充分条件假言推理的肯定前件式和全称量词消去后的充分条件假言推理的否定后件式四种有效论式.

Abstract

The study of the logic properties of three part syllogism of New-Hetuvidya is one of the core issues in the study of Hetuvidya.At present,there are two types of representative views:the three part syllogism is completely different from the syllogism,the three part syllogism is equivalent to the AAA form of the syllo-gism,the three part syllogism can be converted into the AAA form of the syllogism,and the three part syllo-gism is essentially a sufficient conditional hypothesis reasoning.The above views have their own strengths and weaknesses,but they all make the mistake of over-generalization.There are four kinds of valid formulae:pe-ripheral syllogism,formal implication negation,positive antecedent of sufficient conditional hypothetical rea-soning after universal quantifier elimination and negative postulate of sufficient conditional hypothetical rea-soning after universal quantifier elimination.

关键词

新因明/三支论式/形式逻辑/三段论

Key words

New-Hetuvidya/Three part syllogism/Formal logic/Syllogism

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
燕山大学

燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.297
ISSN:1009-2692
段落导航相关论文