首页|以何为食,何以为食:饮食人类学研究的四种范式

以何为食,何以为食:饮食人类学研究的四种范式

扫码查看
饮食源于自然,成于技艺,多样于文化,并与个体和社会紧密交织.在人类学领域,不同学者从不同视角提出了不同的饮食研究路径,可将其归纳为四种范式:一是以马文·哈里斯为代表的"需求范式",主张以生存适应结果反溯群体饮食与自然的关系来研究饮食;二是以西敏司为代表的"政治经济范式",主张从食物背后的政治经济过程出发,不仅关注食物在全球范围内的流动、分配和消费模式,而且力图揭示食物背后复杂的权力关系、经济利益和文化认同;三是"阶层区分范式",以布迪厄的理论为基础,关注食物消费在不同社会阶层间的差异及其对社会身份与阶层区分的强化作用.四是以萨林斯为代表的"文化安排范式",强调饮食作为文化制度安排的结果,吃什么、如何吃均深刻反映并塑造着特定的文化逻辑与价值观.
What to Eat and How to Eat:Four Paradigms in the Study of the Anthropology of Food
Dietary practices originate from nature,are shaped by skills,diversified by cultures,and intricately intertwined with individuals and society.In the field of anthropology,various scholars have proposed distinct approaches to the study of food and diet from different perspectives,which can be summarized into four paradigms:Firstly,the"Need Paradigm"represented by Marvin Harris,which advocates studying diets by tracing back the relationship between group diets and nature through the results of survival adaptation.Secondly,the"Political Economic Paradigm"represented by Sidney Mintz,which emphasizes the political and economic processes underlying food,focusing not only on the global flow,distribution,and consumption patterns of food but also aiming to uncover the complex power relations,economic interests,and cultural identities concealed behind food.Thirdly,the"Distinction Paradigm,"grounded in Pierre Bourdieu's theory,focuses on the differences in food consumption among different social classes and their reinforcing effects on social identities and class distinctions.Lastly,the"Cultural Arrangement Paradigm"represented by Sahlins,which emphasizes that diet,as a result of cultural institutional arrangements,deeply reflects and shapes specific cultural logics and values in terms of what and how people eat.

FoodAnthropology of FoodParadigm

彭涛、吴文萍

展开 >

贵州大学历史与民族文化学院(贵阳,550025)

浙江大学医学院(杭州,310058)

食物 饮食人类学 范式

2023年贵州大学人才引进基金

贵大人基合字[2023]57号

2024

原生态民族文化学刊
凯里学院

原生态民族文化学刊

CHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.349
ISSN:1674-621X
年,卷(期):2024.16(5)