首页|国际投资仲裁确立先例的可行性分析

国际投资仲裁确立先例的可行性分析

扫码查看
国际投资仲裁理论和实践没有国内法律体系下的先例概念,但晚近以来,国际投资仲裁庭对于既判裁决的使用具有普遍性,使用样态包括赋予既判裁决"说服力效力""区分性效力""辅助性效力""规范性效力"等.国际投资仲裁"先例"概念正在形成与演化:一方面,附理由裁决和裁决公开奠定了在国际投资仲裁领域可以讨论先例的基础;另一方面,确立先例应建立在肯定国际投资仲裁庭具有发展国际投资法义务和追求裁决一致性目标的认知基础上.
Feasibility Analysis of the Establishment of Precedents in International Investment Arbitration
There is no doctrine of precedents in the theory and practice of international investment arbitration as in domestic law.Orthodoxies of international law denies that the decisions of tribunals can be a normative source for the rules of international law.However,in recent years,the use of past awards by tribunals has become widespread,with the use of such awards including giving them"persuasive effect""distinguishing effect""auxiliary effect"and"normative effect".The notion of"precedent"in ISDS is emerging and evolving.On the one hand,reasoned awards and publicity lay the foundation for discussing precedents in the field of international investment arbitration;on the other hand,the establishment of precedents should be based on affirming that arbitrators are under a general duty towards the development of investment law and the consistency of decisions in ISDS as a whole.

international investment arbitrationprior decisionsprecedents

陈云东、程丹萍

展开 >

云南大学法学院,云南 昆明 650500

国际投资仲裁 既判裁决 先例

2024

烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
烟台大学

烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.467
ISSN:1002-3194
年,卷(期):2024.37(5)