首页|探讨C-TIRADS分类及ACR-TIRADS分类在诊断桥本甲状腺炎背景下桥本结节和甲状腺乳头状癌中的应用价值

探讨C-TIRADS分类及ACR-TIRADS分类在诊断桥本甲状腺炎背景下桥本结节和甲状腺乳头状癌中的应用价值

扫码查看
目的:探讨中国甲状腺结节超声恶性危险分层(C-TIRADS)分类及美国放射学会发布的(ACR-TIRADS)分类在诊断桥本甲状腺炎背景下桥本结节和甲状腺乳头状癌中的应用价值.方法:选择惠州市第一人民医院2021年1月-2023年1月住院的患者72例,所有患者伴有桥本结节或甲状腺乳头状癌共134个结节,均进行超声检查,并以术后病理检查为金标准,将其划分为HT组(25例,结节数目38个)和PTC组(47例,结节数目96个),对比两组的影像学表现,及C-TIRADS分类、ACR-TIRADS分类对诊断结节良恶性程度的比较.结果:两组患者的超声特征比较,HT多表现为边界不清晰、边缘不规则、高/等回声和无局灶性强回声的结节,PTC多表现为边缘不规则不清晰、低回声、微钙化的结节.其中PTC的纵横比、内部结构比值较HT比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),PTC的边缘、回声、钙化、声晕等比值较HT比值升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);C-TIRADS分类TR3恶性率14.29%、TR4恶性率18.18%、TR5恶性率98.90%,ACR-TIRADS分类4B类恶性率43.33%、4C类恶性率89.19%、5类恶性率98.00%,其对结节恶性性质的比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:ACR-TIRADS分级方法对桥本结节和甲状腺乳头状癌诊断较为复杂,而C-TIRADS的分级方法更为简便,且更贴近临床.
Exploring the Application Value of C-TIRADS Classification and ACR-TIRADS Classification in the Diagnosis of Hashimoto Nodules and Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in the Context of Hashimoto's Thyroiditis
Objective:To explore the application value of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System(C-TIRADS)and American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging,Reporting and Data Sys-tem(ACR-TIRADS)classifications in the diagnosis of Hashimoto's nodules and papillary thyroid carci-noma(PTC)in the context of Hashimoto's thyroiditis in China.Methods:72 patients admitted to the First People's Hospital of Huizhou from January 2021 to January 2023 were selected.These patients had a to-tal of 134 nodules,including Hashimoto's nodules and PTC,which were evaluated using ultrasound.Post-operative pathological examination was used as the gold standard.The nodules were divided into Hashi-moto's thyroiditis(HT)group(25 cases,38 nodules)and PTC group(47 cases,96 nodules).The imaging manifestations of the two groups were compared,,focusing on the differences in ultrasonic characteristics and the diagnostic accuracy of C-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS classifications.Results:HT nodules typi-cally exhibited unclear boundaries,irregular edges,high/equal echogenicity,and absence of focal strong echogenicity,while PTC nodules often showed irregular and unclear edges,low echogenicity,and micro-calcifications.There were no statistically significant differences in the aspect ratio and internal structure between the two groups of patients in terms of ultrasound characteristics(P>0.05),but there were statisti-cally significant differences in edge,echo,calcification,and acoustic halo(P<0.05).C-TIRADS catego-ries TR3,TR4,and TR5 demonstrated malignancy rates of 14.29%,18.18%,and 98.90%,respectively,while ACR-TIRADS categories 4B,4C,and 5 had malignancy rates of 43.33%,89.19%,and 98.00%,re-spectively.The difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two systems was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The ACR-TIRADS grading method is more complex in diagnosis of Hashimoto nod-ules and papillary thyroid carcinoma,while the C-TIRADS grading method is more convenient and closer to clinical practice.

C-TIRADSACR-TIRADSHashimoto nodules in the background of Hashimoto's thy-roiditisPapillary thyroid carcinoma

陈煜桦、周玉祥

展开 >

汕头大学医学院,广东 515000

惠州市第一人民医院超声科,广东 516001

惠州市中心人民医院放射科,广东 516001

C-TIRADS ACR-TIRADS分类 桥本甲状腺炎背景下桥本结节 甲状腺乳头状癌

2024

影像技术
中国感光学会 全国轻工感光材料信息中心

影像技术

影响因子:0.37
ISSN:1001-0270
年,卷(期):2024.36(3)
  • 18