首页|多层螺旋CT与MR在颈动脉狭窄和粥样硬化斑块中的应用对比

多层螺旋CT与MR在颈动脉狭窄和粥样硬化斑块中的应用对比

扫码查看
目的:对比粥样硬化斑块和颈动脉狭窄诊断中多层螺旋CT(MSCT)与MR的应用价值.方法:回顾性选取2020年2月-2022年2月本院粥样硬化斑块和颈动脉狭窄患者120例,依据诊断方法分为MSCT组、MR组两组,各60例.统计分析两组粥样硬化斑块、颈动脉狭窄、检查时间、成本费用、满意度.结果:两组患者的各粥样硬化斑块检出率之间的差异不显著(x2=1.06,P>0.05),其中MSCT组患者的纤维斑块检出率30.00%(18/60)低于MR组53.33%(32/60)(P<0.05),钙化斑块检出率43.33%(26/60)高于MR组26.67%(16/60)(P<0.05),但两组患者的脂质斑块、混合斑块检出率之间的差异均不显著(P>0.05).MSCT组和MR组患者的颈动脉狭窄率之间的差异均不显著(x2=0.10,P>0.05),其中0级、1级、2级、3级、4级比率之间的差异均不显著(P>0.05).MSCT组患者的检查时间短于MR组(P<0.05),成本费用低于MR组(P<0.05).MSCT组患者的满意度73.33%(44/60)低于MR组96.67%(58/60)(x2=4.71,P<0.05).结论:粥样硬化斑块和颈动脉狭窄诊断中MSCT与MR的应用价值基本相当,MSCT更适用于钙化斑块的诊断,MR更适用于纤维斑块的诊断,值得注意的是,MR的满意度显著高于MSCT,临床可以依据患者的实际病情合理选择检查方法.
Comparison of Multislice Spiral CT and MR in Carotid Artery Stenosis and Atherosclerotic Plaque
Objective:To compare the application value of multi-slice spiral CT(MSCT)and MR in the diagnosis of atherosclerotic plaque and carotid artery stenosis.Methods:A total of 120 patients with atherosclerotic plaque and carotid artery stenosis in our hospital from February 2020 to February 2022 were retrospectively selected.They were divided into two groups according to diagnostic methods:MSCT group and MR Group,with 60 patients in each group.Atherosclerotic plaque,carotid artery stenosis,ex-amination time,cost,and patient satisfaction were statistically analyzed in the two groups.Results:There was no significant difference in the detection rate of atherosclerotic plaques between the two groups(x2=1.06,P>0.05).The detection rate of fibrous plaques in the MSCT group was 30.00%(18/60)lower than that in the MR Group(53.33%(32/60)(P<0.05).The detection rate of calcified plaque was 43.33%(26/60)higher than that of MR Group(26.67%(16/60)(P<0.05).However,there were no significant differences in the detection rates of lipid plaque and mixed plaque between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in carotid artery stenosis rate between the MSCT group and MR Group(x2=0.10,P>0.05).Among these,the ratios were not significantly different(P>0.05).The examination time in MSCT group was shorter than that in MR group(P<0.05),and the cost was lower than that in MR group(P<0.05).The satisfaction rate of patients in the MSCT group was 73.33%(44/60)lower than that in the MR group(96.67%(58/60)(x2=4.71,P<0.05).Conclusion:The application value of MSCT and MR in the di-agnosis of atherosclerotic plaque and carotid artery stenosis is basically equal.MSCT is more suitable for the diagnosis of calcified plaque,while MR is more suitable for the diagnosis of fibrous plaque.It is worth noting that the satisfaction level of MR is significantly higher than that of MSCT.The examination method can be reasonably selected according to the actual condition of patients.

atherosclerotic plaquecarotid artery stenosisMRmultislice spiral CTinspection timecostsatisfaction degree

覃延

展开 >

广西贵港市人民医院放射科,广西 537100

粥样硬化斑块 颈动脉狭窄 MR 多层螺旋CT 检查时间 成本费用 满意度

2024

影像技术
中国感光学会 全国轻工感光材料信息中心

影像技术

影响因子:0.37
ISSN:1001-0270
年,卷(期):2024.36(4)