首页|多模态超声联合人工智能S-Detect技术对BI-RADS 4类乳腺结节的诊断分析

多模态超声联合人工智能S-Detect技术对BI-RADS 4类乳腺结节的诊断分析

扫码查看
目的:分析多模态超声联合人工智能S-Detect技术对乳腺影像报告数据系统(BI-RADS)4类乳腺结节的诊断价值.方法:回顾性收集2020年9月-2024年3月我院收治的62例乳腺病变患者,统计分析所有患者的临床资料,对比不同诊断方法的诊断结果,以病理诊断为金标准,分析多模态超声联合人工智能S-Detect技术对BI-RADS 4 类乳腺结节的诊断效能.结果:恶性乳腺结节的超声造影特征为:高增强、增强方式呈向心性、内部回声不均匀、形态不规则、边缘不清晰、存在周边放射状血管及增强后病灶体积增大.本组62例患者共76个乳腺结节,病理结果显示42个结节为恶性,34个结节为良性;常规超声诊断出34个恶性,敏感度为71.43%,特异度为88.24%,准确率为78.95%;人工智能S-Detect技术诊断出39个恶性,敏感度为76.19%,特异度为79.41%,准确率为77.63%;多模态超声诊断出44个恶性,敏感度为85.71%,特异度为76.47%,准确率为81.58%;多模态超声联合人工智能S-Detect技术诊断出45个恶性,敏感度为95.24%,特异度为85.29%,准确率为90.79%,其中多模态超声联合人工智能S-Detect技术检查的诊断结果与病理结果的一致性最高,Kappa值为0.812.ROC曲线对比分析显示,多模态超声联合人工智能S-Detect技术的诊断效能与单纯常规超声、人工智能S-Detect技术、多模态超声比较均有统计学意义(Z=0.275/2.603/2.083,P=0.023/0.009/0.037).结论:相较于单一超声、多模态超声、人工智能S-Detect技术,多模态超声联合人工智能S-Detect技术诊断BI-RADS4类乳腺结节的诊断效能较高,其诊断结果与病理结果高度一致.
Multi-modal Ultrasound Combined with Artificial Intelligence S-Detect Technology for Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Types of Breast Nodules
Objective:To analyze the diagnostic value of multimodal ultrasound combined with artifi-cial intelligence S-Detect technology in breast Image Reporting Data System(BI-RADS)for 4 types of breast nodules.Methods:Sixty-two patients with breast lesions admitted to our hospital from September 2020 to March 2024 were retrospectively collected,and the clinical data of all patients were statistically analyzed.The diagnostic results of different diagnostic methods were compared,and the diagnostic effi-ciency of multi-modal ultrasound combined with artificial intelligence S-Detect technology for BI-RADS type 4 breast nodules was analyzed with pathological diagnosis as the gold standard.Results:The features of contra-ultrasound of malignant breast nodules are:high enhancement,centripetal enhancement,un-even internal echo,irregular shape,unclear edge,presence of peripheral radial vessels,and increased le-sion volume after enhancement.There were 76 breast nodules in 62 patients in this group.Pathological re-sults showed that 42 nodules were malignant and 34 nodules were benign.34 malignant cases were diag-nosed by conventional ultrasound,the sensitivity was 71.43%,the specificity was 88.24%and the accu-racy was 78.95%.The artificial intelligence S-Detect technology diagnosed 39 malignancies,the sensitiv-ity was 76.19%,the specificity was 79.41%,and the accuracy was 77.63%.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of 44 malignancies were 85.71%,76.47%and 81.58%respectively.The multi-modal ultra-sound combined with artificial intelligence S-Detect technology diagnosed 45 malignancies,with a sensi-tivity of 95.24%,specificity of 85.29%and accuracy of 90.79%.The pathological results were taken as the gold standard,and the diagnosis results of multi-modal ultrasound combined with artificial intelli-gence S-Detect technology were highly consistent with the pathological results,with the highest consis-tency.The Kappa value was 0.812,the sensitivity was 95.24%,the specificity was 85.29%and the accu-racy was 90.79%.Comparative analysis of ROC curve showed that the diagnostic efficiency of multi-mode ultrasound combined with artificial intelligence S-Detect technology was statistically significant compared with that of conventional ultrasound alone,artificial intelligence S-Detect technology and multi-mode ultrasound(Z=0.275/2.603/2.083,P=0.023/0.009/0.037).Conclusion:Compared with single ultrasound,multi-modal ultrasound and artificial intelligence S-Detect technology,multi-modal ultra-sound combined with artificial intelligence S-Detect technology has higher diagnostic efficiency in the di-agnosis of BI RADS type 4 breast nodules,which is highly consistent with pathological results.It can be popularized and applied.

Breast nodulesBI-RADS classificationMultimode ultrasoundArtificial intelligence S-Detect technology

钟树兴、郭红梅、刘美玲、王霞

展开 >

东莞市妇幼保健院超声科,广东 523057

乳腺结节 BI-RADS分类 多模态超声 人工智能S-Detect技术

东莞市社会发展科技项目

20231800938292

2024

影像技术
中国感光学会 全国轻工感光材料信息中心

影像技术

影响因子:0.37
ISSN:1001-0270
年,卷(期):2024.36(5)