首页|清单式教学管理联合双向评价体系在临床护理教学中的实践研究

清单式教学管理联合双向评价体系在临床护理教学中的实践研究

扫码查看
目的 构建临床护理教学过程中的清单式教学管理联合双向评价体系。方法 选取2023年3月至2023年7月实习的120名护生和30名符合标准的临床护理带教教师进行问卷调查,借助质性研究与量性研究相结合的方式进行数据信息整理与分析,通过问卷调查数据结果构建符合临床护理教学工作的清单式教学管理联合双向评价体系和评价指标。利用SPSS 27。0进行信度与效度检验,采用差异分析教学效果;利用主成分分析法检验质性研究下拟定的评价指标,以及确定评价指标的权重,结果 临床护理教学质量双向评价指标KMO值为0。884,克隆巴赫Alpha值为0。940,临床护理教学质量双向评价及各指标的信度和效度水平较高;主成分分析法提取了教学态度、教学能力、教学责任感、协作意识、学习能力、操作能力和专业素质7个评价指标,其因子载荷值均高于0。5;通过配对样本秩和检验发现清单式教学管理下临床护理教学质量双向评价前测数据与后测数据在教学质量及各维度上存在显著性差异,且后测秩均值194。86高于前测秩均值106。14,说明在清单式教学管理联合双向评价体系的干预下,临床护理教学质量双向评价水平明显提升。结论 清单式教学管理联合双向评价体系对临床护理教育工作具有明显的推动作用,可增强临床护理教学效果。
Research on practice of checklist teaching management combined with a bidirectional evaluation system in clinical nursing teaching
Objective To construct checklist teaching management combined with a bidirectional evaluation system in clinical nursing teaching.Methods A total of 120 nursing students who interned from March to July 2023 and 30 qualified clinical nursing teachers were selected to conduct a questionnaire survey.The data and information were collated and analyzed using qualitative and quantitative research.Based on the results of the questionnaire survey,checklist teaching management combined with the bidirectional evaluation system and evaluation indicators were constructed in line with the requirements of clinical nursing teaching.Reliability and validity tests were conducted using SPSS 27.0.Teaching effectiveness was analyzed through difference analysis.Principal component analysis was used to investigate the evaluation indicators identified in qualitative research and to determine the weights of these indicators.Results The clinical nursing teaching quality bidirectional evaluation indicators showed a KMO value of 0.884 and a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.940,indicating high reliability and validity of these indicators and the evaluation system.The principal component analysis identified seven evaluation indicators,i.e.,teaching attitude,teaching ability,teaching responsibility,cooperative consciousness,learning ability,operating ability,and professional quality,and their loading values were all higher than 0.5.The paired sample rank sum test showed significant differences in teaching quality and all dimensions of bidirectional evaluation of clinical nursing teaching quality under checklist teaching management before and after teaching.The mean rank after teaching(194.86)was higher than that before teaching(106.14).These results indicated that the intervention of checklist teaching management combined with the bidirectional evaluation system significantly improved the bidirectional evaluation of clinical nursing teaching quality.Conclusions The combination of checklist teaching management with the bidirectional evaluation system is effective in promoting the clinical nursing education and can enhance the effectiveness of clinical nursing teaching.

Checklist teaching managementBidirectional evaluationClinical nursing teaching

杨越、南亦劼、韩雪

展开 >

哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院乳腺外科四病区,哈尔滨 150086

黑龙江护理高等专科学校护理学院,哈尔滨 150086

清单式教学管理 双向评价 临床护理教学

黑龙江省教育科学规划重点课题

GJB1423217

2024

中华医学教育探索杂志
中华医学会

中华医学教育探索杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.641
ISSN:2095-1485
年,卷(期):2024.23(7)