摘要
目的 了解我国医学研究生导师对研究生教育质量的评价,发现研究生教育质量短板并提出相应建议.方法 2023年10至11月采用自编问卷,面向全国37所院校6 025名医学研究生导师,对研究生教育中的学校管理、导师队伍建设、研究生培养过程和研究生培养结果的评价进行调查.使用SPSS 26.0进行t检验和方差分析探究不同导师群体对各环节的评分差异情况.结果 医学研究生导师对研究生教育中的学校管理、导师队伍建设、研究生培养过程和研究生培养结果的评分依次为(4.63±0.60)、(4.59±0.62)、(4.58±0.59)和(4.54±0.62);临床医学类、46~55岁、教龄为5年及以下、硕士生导师、仅指导专业学位研究生、指导学生人数3人及以下、最高学历为学士学位、职称为正高级、担任行政职务、工作日日均工作时长为8~9 h、节假日日均工作时长为4 h及以下的导师对研究生教育质量各环节的评分更高(P<0.05).结论 导师对医学研究生教育质量的总体评价较高.建议应当持续优化院校管理制度,加强导师队伍建设,重点关注研究生培养过程与培养结果,不断提升研究生教育质量.
Abstract
Objective To understand the evaluation of graduate education quality by medical graduate supervisors in China,to identify the shortcomings of graduate education quality,and to put forward corresponding suggestions.Methods From October to November 2023,a self-designed questionnaire was used to investigate the evaluation of school management,supervisor team construction,graduate training process,and graduate training results by 6 025 medical graduate supervisors from 37 universities in China.SPSS 26.0 was used to conduct t-test and analysis of variance to explore the differences in scores given by different supervisor groups for various aspects.Results The scores given by medical graduate supervisors for school management,supervisor team construction,graduate training process,and graduate training results were(4.63±0.60),(4.59±0.62),(4.58±0.59),and(4.54±0.62),respectively.Supervisors who work in clinical medicine,aged 46-55 years,with 5 or fewer years of teaching experience,supervising master's students,instructing only professional degree students,instructing three or fewer students,holding a bachelor's degree as their highest degree,with the title of professor,holding an administrative position,and working an average of 8-9 hours per day on weekdays and 4 or fewer hours per day on holidays,gave higher scores on all aspects of graduate education quality(P<0.05).Conclusions The supervisors gave high scores on the quality of medical graduate education.It is suggested that the quality of graduate education should be continuously improved by optimizing school management systems,strengthening the construction of supervisory teams,and focusing on the process and results of graduate education.