首页|硬膜外麻醉与腰硬联合麻醉在剖宫产中的麻醉效果及对血流动力学的影响

硬膜外麻醉与腰硬联合麻醉在剖宫产中的麻醉效果及对血流动力学的影响

扫码查看
目的 观察硬膜外麻醉与腰硬联合麻醉在剖宫产中的麻醉效果及对血流动力学的影响.方法 选取2020年1月-2023年2月在我院行剖宫产的62例产妇为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组(n=31)和观察组(n=31).对照组采用硬膜外麻醉,观察组采用腰硬联合麻醉,比较两组麻醉效果、麻醉起效时间、痛觉最高平面、不同时间段产妇血流动力学指标(血压、心率)、不同时间段疼痛(VAS)评分以及不良反应发生情况.结果 观察组麻醉优良率为93.55%,高于对照组的80.65%(P<0.05);观察组麻醉起效时间、痛觉最高平面均短于对照组(P<0.05);两组切皮时产妇心率均高于麻醉前,舒张压、收缩压均低于麻醉前,但观察组心率低于对照组,舒张压、收缩压高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术后6、12、24 h的VAS评分均小于对照组(P<0.05);观察组不良反应发生率为6.45%,低于对照组的19.35%(P<0.05).结论 与硬膜外麻醉比较,腰硬联合麻醉在剖宫产中的麻醉效果显著,麻醉起效快速,不仅对血流动力学影响小,而且可显著减轻术后不产妇疼痛度,且可降低麻醉不良反应,具有确切的临床应用优势.
Anesthetic Effect of Epidural Anesthesia and Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Section and its Influence on Hemodynamics
Objective To observe the anesthetic effect of epidural anesthesia and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in cesarean section and its influence on hemodynamics.Methods A total of 62 parturients who underwent cesarean section in our hospital from January 2020 to February 2023 were selected as the research objects.They were divided into control group(n=31)and observation group(n=31)by random number table method.The control group was treated with epidural anesthesia,and the observation group was treated with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.The anesthetic effect,anesthesia onset time,highest pain level,maternal hemodynamic indexes(blood pressure,heart rate)at different time periods,pain(VAS)scores at different time periods and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The excellent and good rate of anesthesia in the observation group was 93.55%,which was higher than 80.65%in the control group(P<0.05).The onset time of anesthesia and the highest level of pain in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group(P<0.05).The heart rate of the two groups during skin incision was higher than that before anesthesia,and the diastolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure were lower than those before anesthesia,but the heart rate of the observation group was lower than that of the control group,and the diastolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).The VAS score of the observation group at 6,12 and 24 h after operation was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 6.45%,which was lower than 19.35%in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with epidural anesthesia,combined spinal-epidural anesthesia has a significant anesthetic effect in cesarean section,and the onset of anesthesia is rapid.Meanwhile,it not only has little effect on hemodynamics,but also can significantly reduce the postoperative pain of non-pregnant women,and can reduce the adverse reactions of anesthesia.It has significant clinical application advantages.

Epidural anesthesiaCombined spinal-epidural anesthesiaCesarean sectionAnesthetic effectHemodynamics

王赢、李辉

展开 >

万载县人民医院麻醉科,江西 万载 336100

硬膜外麻醉 腰硬联合麻醉 剖宫产 麻醉效果 血流动力学

2024

医学信息
国家卫生部信息化管理领导小组 中国电子学会中国医药信息学分会 陕西文博生物信息工程研究所

医学信息

影响因子:0.161
ISSN:1006-1959
年,卷(期):2024.37(17)