首页|心电图检查联合临床特征诊断冠心病心绞痛的价值

心电图检查联合临床特征诊断冠心病心绞痛的价值

扫码查看
目的 研究心电图检查联合临床特征分析诊断冠心病心绞痛的价值.方法 选取 2020 年 6 月-2023 年 6 月在我院诊治的68 例疑似冠心病心绞痛患者为研究对象,均进行心电图检查、临床特征分析,以冠状动脉造影为诊断标准,观察不同诊断方法的诊断效能(灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值)及对不同类型心绞痛的检出率,分析其诊断结果与冠状动脉造影结果的一致性及ROC曲线.结果 心电图检查+临床特征分析诊断冠心病心绞痛的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值均高于心电图检查、临床特征分析单独诊断(P<0.05),且心电图检查的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值高于临床特征分析(P<0.05);心电图检查+临床特征分析诊断稳定型、不稳定型心绞痛的检出率均高于心电图检查、临床特征分析单独诊断,且心电图检出率高于临床特征分析(P<0.05);心电图检查+临床特征分析诊断冠心病心绞痛结果与冠状动脉造影诊断结果一致性较高(Kappa=0.921),且一致性高于心电图检查、临床特征分析单独诊断(P<0.05);ROC曲线显示,心电图检查、临床特征分析单独诊断冠心病心绞痛的AUC面积比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),心电图检查+临床特征分析诊断该病的AUC面积均大于心电图检查、临床特征分析单独诊断(P<0.05).结论 心电图检查联合临床特征分析诊断冠心病心绞痛的价值较高,基本可获得与冠状动脉造影相似的结果,且对患者无创伤,应用安全性好,值得临床予以重视.
Value of Electrocardiogram Combined with Clinical Features in the Diagnosis of Angina Pectoris of Coronary Heart Disease
Objective To study the value of electrocardiogram combined with clinical features in the diagnosis of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease.Methods A total of 68 patients with suspected coronary heart disease and angina pectoris who were diagnosed and treated in our hospital from June 2020 to June 2023 were selected as the research objects.All patients underwent electrocardiogram examination and clinical feature analysis.Coronary angiography was used as the diagnostic standard to observe the diagnostic efficacy of different diagnostic methods(sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value)and the detection rate of different types of angina pectoris.The consistency and ROC curve of the diagnostic results with coronary angiography were analyzed.Results The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of electrocardiogram examination+clinical feature analysis in the diagnosis of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease were higher than those of electrocardiogram examination and clinical feature analysis(P<0.05),and the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of electrocardiogram examination were higher than those of clinical feature analysis(P<0.05).The detection rate of stable and unstable angina pectoris diagnosed by electrocardiogram examination+clinical feature analysis was higher than that of electrocardiogram examination and clinical feature analysis alone,and the detection rate of electrocardiogram was higher than that of clinical feature analysis(P<0.05).The results of electrocardiogram+clinical feature analysis in the diagnosis of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease were highly consistent with those of coronary angiography(Kappa=0.921),and the consistency was higher than that of electrocardiogram and clinical feature analysis(P<0.05).ROC curve showed that there was no significant difference in AUC area between ECG examination and clinical feature analysis in the diagnosis of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease(P>0.05).The AUC area of ECG examination+clinical feature analysis in the diagnosis of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease was larger than that of ECG examination and clinical feature analysis(P<0.05).Conclusion The value of electrocardiogram combined with clinical feature analysis in the diagnosis of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease is high.It can basically obtain similar results as coronary angiography,and it is non-invasive and safe for patients.It is worthy of clinical attention.

ElectrocardiogramClinical characteristicsCoronary heart diseaseAngina pectoris

吴有英

展开 >

弋阳县人民医院心电图室,江西 弋阳 334400

心电图 临床特征 冠心病 心绞痛

2024

医学信息
国家卫生部信息化管理领导小组 中国电子学会中国医药信息学分会 陕西文博生物信息工程研究所

医学信息

影响因子:0.161
ISSN:1006-1959
年,卷(期):2024.37(23)