医学与社会2024,Vol.37Issue(3) :1-7.DOI:10.13723/j.yxysh.2024.03.001

中美公共卫生领域学术合作的文献分析

Literature Analysis of Academic Cooperation in the Field of Public Health Between China and the United States

彭佳 方晢伊 黄葭燕
医学与社会2024,Vol.37Issue(3) :1-7.DOI:10.13723/j.yxysh.2024.03.001

中美公共卫生领域学术合作的文献分析

Literature Analysis of Academic Cooperation in the Field of Public Health Between China and the United States

彭佳 1方晢伊 1黄葭燕1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 复旦大学公共卫生学院,上海,200032;国家卫生健康委员会卫生技术评估重点实验室(复旦大学),上海,200032
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:分析中美公共卫生领域学术合作发文的特点及变化趋势,为进一步促进两国的卫生学术合作提出循证证据和参考依据.方法:在Web of Science核心合集数据库,检索中美在公共卫生领域学术合作发表的文献,依据美国总统任期划分为5 个阶段,基于文献计量分析的方法,对各阶段发文的数量、研究热点、国家主导率以及机构合作特点进行分析.结果:共检索 12103 篇文献,各阶段的年均发文数量持续增长,拜登政府时期达到最高值1372 篇.中国在中美公共卫生学术合作中的主导率不断上升,至奥巴马政府时期超过美国,达到 53.92%,在特朗普政府时期最高,为 63.57%.5 个阶段发文量前 10 的机构中,中国机构从 6个增加到9 个,但中介中心性值≥0.1 的中国机构数量逐渐减少.结论:中国在中美公共卫生学术合作中的主导地位不断上升,合作的研究热点趋于多样化,但中国机构的学术影响力仍有待提高.

Abstract

Objective:To analyze the trends and characteristics of Sino-US academic cooperation in the field of public health,so as to provide evidence and references for further promoting health academic collaboration.Methods:The articles published by the Sino-US academic collaboration in the field of public health were retrieved based on the Web of Science Core Col-lection database.These articles were categorized into 5 stages according to the presidency of the United States.The number of arti-cles,research hotspots,the dominance of countries,and characteristics of institutional cooperation were analyzed at each stage using the method of bibliometric analysis.Results:A total of 12103 articles were retrieved.The average annual number of articles continued to increase across the 5 stages,reaching a peak of 1372 during the Biden administration.The dominant rate of China had been increasing,surpassing the United States during the Obama administration and peaking at 63.57%during the Trump adminis-tration.Among the top 10 institutions with the highest number of publications in 5 stages,the number of Chinese institutions in-creased from 6 to 9.However,the number of Chinese institutions with intermediary centrality values≥0.1 decreased.Conclusion:China's dominance in Sino-US public health academic cooperation is constantly increasing,and the hotspots of cooperation are more diverse.However,the academic influence of Chinese institutions still needs improvement.

关键词

公共卫生/国际学术合作/文献计量分析

Key words

Public Health/International Academic Cooperation/Bibliometric Analysis

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

国家社会科学基金重大研究专项(20VMG027)

出版年

2024
医学与社会
华中科技大学同济医学院

医学与社会

CSTPCDCHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.178
ISSN:1006-5563
参考文献量30
段落导航相关论文