首页|非法植入基因编辑、克隆胚胎罪的解释学审视——对立法批判论的回应

非法植入基因编辑、克隆胚胎罪的解释学审视——对立法批判论的回应

Hermeneutic Review of the Crime of Illegal Implantation of Gene-edited and Cloned Embryos:A Response to Legislative Criticism

扫码查看
非法植入基因编辑、克隆胚胎罪设立后,学界存有部分反对观点认为本罪分则位置及实行行为的规定存在问题.基于解释论的立场,本罪保护法益为基因库安全、人性尊严以及公共卫生管理秩序,立法通过对形式法益的保护一并实现了对实质法益的保护,且公共卫生管理秩序是主要法益,故本罪在刑法分则中的体系位置无可厚非.因为"植入人或动物子宫"的行为是实现生殖系基因编辑或生殖性克隆目的的必经阶段,所以本罪实行行为的规定在技术层面上彻底断绝了被基因编辑、克隆的细胞发育成存活个体的机会,从而达到了对该犯罪行为规制的立法目的.
After the establishment of the crime of illegal implantation of gene-edited and cloned embryos,there have been some opposing views in academia suggesting issues with the position and provisions of the offense.Based on the interpretive perspective,this crime protects the legal interests of gene pool,human dignity and public health management order.The legislation realizes the protection of substantive legal interests through the protection of formal legal interests.Public health management order is considered the primary legal interest,justifying the crime's rightful place within the criminal law system.The provision regarding the act of"implanting into the uterus"is a crucial step in achieving gene editing or reproductive cloning objectives.This provision technically eliminates the opportunity for the edited or cloned cells to develop into a viable individual,thus achieving the legislative purpose of regulating such criminal behavior.

crime of illegal implantation of gene-edited and cloned embryosgerm-line gene editingAmendment(XI)to the Crimi-nal Law of the People's Republic of Chinaprotection of legal interestsactus reus

李雁飞

展开 >

华东政法大学刑事法学院 上海 201620

非法植入基因编辑、克隆胚胎罪 生殖系基因编辑 《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(十一)》 保护法益 实行行为

2024

医学与哲学
中国自然辩证法研究会

医学与哲学

CSTPCDCHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.314
ISSN:1002-0772
年,卷(期):2024.45(3)
  • 30