医学与哲学2024,Vol.45Issue(7) :42-46.DOI:10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2024.07.09

尸体肝移植受体两种伦理审查形式之伦理问题探讨

Discussion on the Ethical Issues of Two Forms of Ethical Reviews of Cadaveric Liver Transplantation Receptors

牛世琦 邓蕊
医学与哲学2024,Vol.45Issue(7) :42-46.DOI:10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2024.07.09

尸体肝移植受体两种伦理审查形式之伦理问题探讨

Discussion on the Ethical Issues of Two Forms of Ethical Reviews of Cadaveric Liver Transplantation Receptors

牛世琦 1邓蕊1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 山西医科大学人文社会科学学院 山西太原 030001
  • 折叠

摘要

结合尸体肝移植受体会议审查和通讯审查两种审查形式的基本流程,通过对在两种审查形式实践过程中发现的案例进行陈述、分析,发现两种形式分别存在知情同意的"缺位"、公正性的"离场"两个主要伦理问题,并尝试提出可行性建议,包括知情同意相关情况需重点汇报、邀请伦理专家直接参与知情同意过程、通讯审查变快为"慢",以期进一步推动完善尸体肝移植伦理审查相关工作,使其能够更好地实现保障受体权益的目标.

Abstract

By combining the basic processes of conference review and correspondence review for cadaveric liver transplantation receptors,this paper presents and analyzes cases discovered during the practice of these two review forms.It identifies two main ethical issues in each form,namely the"absence"of informed consent and the"departure"of impartiality,and attempts to provide feasible suggestions.These suggestions include focusing on the reporting on informed consent-related situations,inviting ethics experts to directly participate in the informed consent process,and transforming correspondence review from fast to"slow",in order to further promote and improve the work related to the ethical review of cadaveric liver transplantation,enabling it to better achieve the goal of protecting the rights and interests of receptors.

关键词

尸体肝移植受体/伦理审查/知情同意/公正性

Key words

cadaveric liver transplantation receptors/ethical review/informed consent/impartiality

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

山西省科技战略研究专项(2023)()

出版年

2024
医学与哲学
中国自然辩证法研究会

医学与哲学

CSTPCDCHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.314
ISSN:1002-0772
参考文献量11
段落导航相关论文