"残"是否必然导致"障":反思健全者中心主义
Does Impairment Entail Disability:Some Reflections on Ableism
张萌 1潘大为2
作者信息
- 1. 中山大学哲学系 广东广州 510275
- 2. 中山大学医学哲学与人文实践协同创新重点实验室 广东广州 510275
- 折叠
摘要
健全者中心主义作为一种对残障问题的传统理解,在"残"和"障"之间建立僵化的和固定的联系.残障是人的正常身心结构或功能的受损状态,这种受损状态直接导致残障者活动受限与生活受限.然而"残"是否必然导致"障"?以健全者中心主义为对象,围绕"正常"这一医学哲学基本概念,对"残"与"障"的关系进行重新省察,尝试提出一种基于可行能力框架的理解残障问题的新角度,更好地实现对残障去障碍的目的.从而为残障者的身份认同以及残障人群与健康人群之间良好平等关系的建立提供更加坚实的哲学基础.
Abstract
Ableism,as a traditional understanding of disability,establishes a rigid link between impairment and disability.Disability is a state of impairment of a person's normal physical or mental structure or functioning,which directly results in limitations in the activities and lives of disabled individuals.However,does impairment entail disability?By analyzing the ableism,this paper examines the concept of normality from the perspective of philosophy of medicine which gives us chance to re-examine the relationship between impairment and disability and try to put forward a new perspective based on the framework of feasible capabilities to understand disability issues better and to achieve the goal of removing barriers for disabled individuals.It will provide a more solid philosophical support for the identity recognition of disabled individuals and the establishment a constructive relationship between disabled and non-disabled population.
关键词
残障研究/健全者中心主义/正常/可行能力Key words
disability studies/ableism/normality/accessibility引用本文复制引用
基金项目
广东省哲学社会科学创新工程特别委托项目(2022)(GD22TWCXGC03)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据