医学与哲学2024,Vol.45Issue(23) :16-18,27.DOI:10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2024.23.04

从瑞典新冠疫情的应对看权力与专业主义的分离

The Separation of Power and Professionalism from the Response to the COVID-19 Epidemic in Sweden

郭佳楠
医学与哲学2024,Vol.45Issue(23) :16-18,27.DOI:10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2024.23.04

从瑞典新冠疫情的应对看权力与专业主义的分离

The Separation of Power and Professionalism from the Response to the COVID-19 Epidemic in Sweden

郭佳楠1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 亚洲理工学院发展与可持续性学院 泰国空滦 12120
  • 折叠

摘要

面对新冠疫情及其引发的多重危机,瑞典在疫情防控方面秉承的典型专家体制,其与瑞典宪法对专家群体与国家政治机构的分离有着密不可分的关系.首先探讨"专家暴政"基本思想、基础概念以及此次疫情应对中暴露的专家治理体制机制问题,通过梳理瑞典不同阶段应对新冠疫情的总体策略、防疫措施体系、经验,从政治体制视角揭示哈耶克知识问题如何促成政策过程中的"专家暴政",总结避免这种专家体制在导致防疫权力结构冲突方面的经验启示,为我国重大传染病疫情防控与加强公共卫生管理建设提供参考借鉴.

Abstract

In the face of the COVID-19 and its multiple crises,Sweden's typical expert system in epidemic prevention and control and the Swedish Constitution have an inseparable relationship with its expert-driven system and the constitutional separation of expert groups and national political institutions.This paper first discusses the basic ideas and foundational concepts of"tyranny of expert",as well as the problems of expert governance system and mechanism exposed in the response to the epidemic.By combing Sweden's overall strategy,epidemic prevention measure system and experience in different stages of the COVID-19 epidemic,from the perspective of political system,this paper reveals how Hayek's knowledge problem contributes to the"tyranny of expert"in the policy-making process.The aim is to summarize the experience and enlightenment of avoiding conflicts within expert-led governance structures for epidemic control,and provides reference for the prevention and control of major infectious diseases and strengthening the construction of public health management in China.

关键词

新冠疫情/瑞典/专家暴政

Key words

COVID-19/Sweden/tyranny of expert

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
医学与哲学
中国自然辩证法研究会

医学与哲学

CSTPCDCHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.314
ISSN:1002-0772
段落导航相关论文