Triggers and Regulation of Moral Outrage in Relation to Patients'Right to Informed Consent
In medical practice,while the fulfillment of patients'informed consent rights reflects respect for individual values,it is often constrained by the complexity of interpersonal communication and public opinion dynamics,carrying the risk of triggering moral outrage.The root cause of the negative effects associated with informed consent lies in medical practitioners'insufficient understanding of its multi-dimensional nature,the lack of respectful communication with patients,and the economic pressures influencing the exercise of this right.Although moral outrage may not always result in irrational disruption,it can significantly impact the medical environment and doctor-patient relationships.The principles of shared decision-making and empathy offer valuable guidance for enhancing ethical awareness of informed consent and improving the standardization of its procedures.
right to informed consentindividual valuesmoral outrageshared decision-making and empathy