影像诊断与介入放射学2014,Issue(6) :466-469.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8001.2014.06.003

3.0TMR动态增强成像在前列腺癌诊断中的应用研究

3 T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI diagnosis of prostate cancer

章绪辉 全显跃 路世龙 黄凡衡
影像诊断与介入放射学2014,Issue(6) :466-469.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8001.2014.06.003

3.0TMR动态增强成像在前列腺癌诊断中的应用研究

3 T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI diagnosis of prostate cancer

章绪辉 1全显跃 1路世龙 1黄凡衡1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 510280广东广州,南方医科大学珠江医院放射科
  • 折叠

摘要

目的探讨3.0 T MR动态增强成像(DCE-MRI)在前列腺癌诊断中的应用价值。方法收集疑诊前列腺癌者75例,所有患者均行T2 WI和DCE-MRI检查。分析比较T2 WI和DCE-MRI对前列腺癌诊断敏感性、特异性和准确性的差异,并分析DCE-MRI对前列腺癌的检出率和Gleason评分的相关性。结果前列腺癌患者44例,T2 WI和DCE-MRI对前列腺癌诊断的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为64%和91%、58%和77%、61%和85%。DCE-MRI诊断敏感性和准确性明显高于T2 WI(P<0.01),而特异性未见明显高于T2 WI(P>0.05)。DCE-MRI对高分化组Gleason评分<7分的前列腺癌检出率明显低于对中低分化组Gleason评分≥7分的前列腺癌(P<0.05)。结论和T2 WI相比,3.0 T DCE-MRI能明显提高对前列腺癌的诊断敏感性和准确性。而且,DCE-MRI更容易检出中低分化的前列腺癌。

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 3 T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI(DCE-MRI)for prostate cancer.Methods 75 patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer underwent T2-weighted MR imaging(T2WI)and DCE-MRI.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of T2WI and DCE-MRI for diagnosing prostate cancer were determined.The relationship between Gleason score and prostate cancer detection on DCE-MRI was also evaluated.Results Of 75 patients,prostate adenocarcinoma was confirmed histopathologically in 44.The sensitivity and accuracy of DCE-MRI(91%,85%)were significantly (P<0.01)higher than those of T2WI(64%,61%).The specificity of DCE-MRI(77%)was not significantly(P>0.05)higher than that of T2WI(58%).The detection rate for Gleason 4-6 cancers was significantly lower than that for Gleason 7-9 cancers(P<0.05). Conclusion 3 T DCE-MRI is superior to T2WI in prostate cancer detection and can detect more aggressive tumors.

关键词

前列腺癌/T2加权成像/磁共振成像/动态增强/Gleason评分

Key words

Prostate cancer/T2 Weight imaging/Magnetic resonance imaging/Dynamic enhancement/Gleason scale

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2014
影像诊断与介入放射学
中山大学

影像诊断与介入放射学

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.51
ISSN:1005-8001
参考文献量5
段落导航相关论文