Clinical application status and progress of personalized knee joint pros-thesis and traditional prosthesis
Knee arthroplasty is one of the important methods for treating severe knee joint diseases,and its clinical efficacy is highly recognized.Over the past few decades,traditional knee prosthesis have achieved significant success in clinical application,but there are still a considerable number of patients who experience poor joint function,persistent pain,or require reoperation after surgery.These issues drive the development of personalized knee prosthesis technology.Personalized prosthesis technology creates prostheses that perfectly match the patient's anatomical structure through high-precision medical imaging and computer-aided design,reducing friction and wear between the prosthesis and bone,further improving surgical accuracy,improving postoperative pain control and functional recovery,and extending service life of the prosthesis.Although this technology has significant potential,there is currently insufficient comparative research on the effectiveness of personalized prostheses and traditional prostheses in practical clinical application,and there is still a lack of large-scale,long-term follow-up clinical data systems to compare and verify actual effectiveness of the two prostheses.Therefore,this article compares performance of two prostheses in postoperative recovery,functional improvement,complications and long-term survival through literature review,evaluates the differences in economic cost and patient satisfaction between the two prostheses,and aims to provide scientific basis for clinical selection of knee arthroplasty,explore feasibility and economic benefits of personalized prostheses.